| Author |
 Replies: 20 / Views: 3,334 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
You are being too picky on this one as the coin appears to be correctly graded. The seller's photos do show all the spots. If I simply do not like a coin, I have no problems paying for the return shipping.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
Was the 20% restocking fee noted by seller in listing?
Edited by Slider23
04/19/2016 2:35 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2843 Posts |
Here's how I see it.
If the pictures that were posted are of the actual coin, not altered, and not hiding a portion of the coin, then I think they are in the right. Coins can look drastically different between photos methods of photography and lighting and so many more factors. A seller is not expected to display the worst photos possible in order to cover all cases.
If pictures intentionally hide or distort facts, then I see it differently.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2843 Posts |
BTW for the record I think your pics look better, and I wonder if that's why the coin sold for less than others. Although the spots show up more on yours, the detail is wayyyyy clearer.
|
|
New Member
United States
28 Posts |
The lighting and the angle were clearly meant to minimize the coin's flaws, but I think you can reasonably expect that when you see a coin photographed in this way. I'm not sure you have much ground to stand on. On the other hand, I think that kind of presentation, combined with a 20% restocking fee, is enough to establish this dealer as somebody you wouldn't want to do business with again.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2403 Posts |
Although the seller used poor light for the picture it is still good enough to tell there are spots on the obverse. There ae no new spots on your pics, they just stand out better. So if the sellers intention was to deceive buyer with the photo, they didn't do a very good job of it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1949 Posts |
Quote:
Not sure if I want to keep it or not, which is why I started the thread. Other MS61s have sold for quite a bit more, but this might be the bottom of the MS61 barrel I don't think this is the bottom of the MS61 barrel, but right around the middle. IMO, an accurately graded MS61... I looked up the listing and saw the seller did clearly state in the auction that there is 20% restocking fee. That, plus the fact that the pictures from the listing IMO do accurately show the look of the coin, not sure you would have much ground to stand on for trying to get back the full refund without paying the restocking fee. (Unless you were to pull the whole 'ITEM NOT AS DESCRIBED' thing with ebay) Quote:
Price was good and only intended to eventually flip it I think if you went to a mid-sized coin show, you could get a cash deal pretty easily for above the price you paid P.S.- I have an AU58 that I paid quite a bit more for than this one! |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7375 Posts |
Really appreciate all the feedback. Seller wants to charge me $25 for the return. Definitely not worth it. Not sure how hard I want to press ebay on the free return/not as described issue. Might own it for a while, but hopefully will be able to make a couple of bucks on it at some point. I'm actually glad that most of you see it as accurately graded. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5828 Posts |
I'd keep it and flip it later... Sounds like you got a decent deal, and the coin is well graded.
Can you post pictures of the reverse?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4337 Posts |
Quote:
The lighting and the angle were clearly meant to minimize the coin's flaws How can you make that statement? Because the picture came out how the picture came out the seller was acting with malfeasance? |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5828 Posts |
 It does look like a nice picture, but I dont think it was intended to cause misgivings about this coin. |
|
New Member
United States
28 Posts |
Quote:
How can you make that statement? Because the picture came out how the picture came out the seller was acting with malfeasance? I didn't say -- and don't believe -- that it was a case of malfeasance. The seller presented the coin in the most attractive light, but he didn't misrepresent the coin. All the flaws are visible in the photo. However, I think it is naive to think that the seller didn't choose that kind of presentation for a reason, especially when we're talking about a coin in this price range. This is not the same as seeing a five-dollar Buffalo nickel photographed in a flip. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
I've decided to keep the coin. It's a bit of a ying yang on how to photograph a coin. Do I have to make a coin look as bad as possible when I sell it.....don't thinK so. But how good should I make it look? In this case I hoped it would be better than I got, but oh well. Can still probably flip it for a profit, but just not as much as I had hope for, que sera sera. There is also a difference between auction and BIN photos imo. Auction description/photos tend to be a bit poorer. I sell mostly BIN, so I need to make sure something is photo'd/described very well since I'm looking for more closer to a retail price.
|
|
CCF Advertiser
United States
1533 Posts |
I hate buyers that try to file a SNAD on a certified coin to try and get out of return shipping or an agreed upon restocking fee and would never do business with them again. The coin looks correctly graded and the pictures do not look deceptive. I'd recommend you keep to your agreement with the seller.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
Thanks for your opinion after the fact. If you had read my previous post I had already put it to bed. Photos can be doctored even on certified coins, which is why I was asking for help form forum members, which they did supply.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 3,334 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 04/19/2016 2:34 pm
