| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 3,243 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
136 Posts |
That's an excellant price you got if for. I think you meant 1984 because that year has the doubled ear variety, but I don't think 1985 has any major error.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5964 Posts |
Eric, He also gave me a sweet deal on this 1917 Type 1.   |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
Thanks Slamnnass it's Unc Details and a note of altered color. It looks to me like it's turning brown a little. Eric there is an awesome Doubled Die for 1985.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
Eric he had a very nice 84 ear penny, very vivid. I could only get these two at the time.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
530 Posts |
|
|
New Member
United States
32 Posts |
WOSER!!! under $200.00 what a SWEEEEEEETTTTTT deal....Love that doubled die reverse....Also the type 1 SLQ is nice also...
Patrick
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
I'm glad ya'll like it. It's the strongest Doubled Die Reverse in the Lincoln series, easy to see with 20/20 vision. Because it's so visible it's not likely to be found in circulation, but it's not impossible.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3644 Posts |
Seems odd it got a details grade doesn't it? I see plating issues on rev and obv with mabi a stain but 'altered color' ?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
119 Posts |
Wow. That is a really really nice acquisition. Congrats. Wow.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
Yes it is uncirculated details. Looks to me like a partial print on the obverse and turning brown.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3644 Posts |
Ive been holding out forever in hopes of finding this one CM but I may have to give in soon myself  Edited by Slamnbass
04/27/2016 11:34 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
Yep, I understand Slamnbass. If you ever get a chance you should see one in hand. Pictures lack something I can't quite describe.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
853 Posts |
Is the 1985 a recent discovery? I have the DDO-001 and it's OK. Wexler lists a decent DDR (WDDR-003), but neither are even close to that 1983. Wexler's WDDR-003 isn't even a "Best of". I'm anxious to see the 1985 you are referring to. It needs to be on my radar. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
Sorry, I misspoke. There are 1985 DD's but none as good as I was thinking. I saw one on here a while back but I believe now it was a 1983. There is a pretty decent 1995, but not as good as the 1983.
Edited by CoinMasters
04/28/2016 12:13 am
|
|
Valued Member
United States
123 Posts |
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 3,243 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 04/25/2016 8:37 pm
