| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 3,533 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
New Member
 United States
12 Posts |
And I've done.my research on some, my wide AMs? I could show you everything I found.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3463 Posts |
 The 1953 has a nice die chip/break on the reverse. The 1935 deserves a closer look at the mint mark. The 1991 cent has some damage, which hurts the coin's value. The rest look like common Copper cents. Can you post some better images of the 1935-D mint mark area? The 1803 Indian charm, the best I an tell, is a 1904 ST. Louis world's fair souvenir , so there may be some collector value to that, but not as a coin. They usually sell for under $15.00. The Wide AM varieties sought after by collectors are dated between 1992 and 2006. The known years are 1992, 1998, 1999, and 2000. Edited by cwb
08/22/2016 7:03 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3463 Posts |
Some websites show that 1803 Indian charm as a 1970's novelty, so I'm not sure where it's originally from, but either way, it's not rare.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
937 Posts |
Beefy, Could you tell us what is special about each one. With this computer I am at a loss as the pics do not show well
Thanks
|
|
Valued Member
United States
81 Posts |
This cannot be a serious post.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3463 Posts |
Quote:
This cannot be a serious post. People who are not familiar with rare coins or mint errors sometimes find strange looking coins in their change. How else are they to learn what they are if they don't ask? I have seen more obviously damaged coins posted with questions about rarity or value, that's how people learn. |
|
Moderator
 United States
188660 Posts |
Quote:
How else are they to learn what they are if they don't ask?  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Absolutely.  |
|
Valued Member
United States
81 Posts |
Excuse me, but please read this guy's other posts, insisting that a somewhat common German error coin is super-valuable, and I think you will observe the mentality of expecting that one's pocket is filled with winning lottery tickets.
Let it suffice to say that it is not so filled.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2403 Posts |
To the CCF Quote:
my wide AMs? As far as I know WAMs'( Wide AM) and CAMs'( Close AM) refers to LMCs from 1992 and 1998 through 2000. Your most recent you have here is a '91. For 1992 your are looking for a CAM for the rest they are WAMs' |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1906 Posts |
the 1935d is interesting-need pictures of the whole coin-obverse and reverse-thank you
|
|
Valued Member
United States
294 Posts |
Looks like a bunch of junk to me.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
The 72 has minor doubling on the pillars/columns. As noted the 1953 has a nice reverse Cud on the left wheat stalk but this is neither uncommon nor valuable. The 1935-D MM is PMD, the 1991 is PMD; I cannot value the "Indian" Pendant/Charm; so 1 cent each except for the 1953, the 1935-D and possibly the 1972. Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
968 Posts |
Buzz, I'd say give him a chance since he has been polite in this thread so far. But if he starts attacking people for telling him things he doesn't want to hear again then I'd support your opinion 100%.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
724 Posts |
I would not bother such damage pieces anymore.
Nice things should be new, shining, beautiful, and rare.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 3,533 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 08/22/2016 6:48 pm
