1967 Quarter Good Learning Coin Or Error Coin ? Better Pics

Mucho better pics! The biggest thing you can learn from this coin is what not to look for. A coin is opposite of the die that struck it. If something on the die is in raised - it is in relief on the coin, and vice versa. PSD (Post Strike Damage) usually leaves recessed marks on the coin, like scratches, nicks, gouges, etc. Now, if they are raised on the coin - they more than likely came from the die. Probably about 98% of valuable Varieties and Errors are valuable because of what the die did to them, whether incuse or in relief.

Some of my best counter clashes were taken in the bathtub. I'm still recovering from my last one.

Last images are great. Thanks, Doug.

You are describing a clashed die. The outline of the design transfer to the opposite die leaving clash marks on the coins struck.

Yes. It is a transfer from a clash, back to the host die.
http://www.error-ref.com/?s=counter+clash
Deep stuff here, but I think it is what you are looking for.

COOP Yes thank you so much for answering back. That's exactly what I was referring to (saw in your video, so thank you for putting all that info together)
When searching the 1967 quarter I found this counter clash for reference which indicates that their was a multiple die event with one of the dies for this year.
The rim error near god we trust and the photos of the wings counter really stuck my newbie eyes for the areas with potential comparison.
Any input on possible link/match and it being an actual clash. Or does YODA say PMD / vice ?

http://www.maddieclashes.com/cclti-25c-1967-01/

Thank you so much for your input coop. Greatly appreciated And very much very much regarded. So grateful for your patience.

CoinMom would it be okay if I use this one in my damage files?