| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,847 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Belgium
2078 Posts |
Since it looks like gold I graded it MS 64 Then I consulted my friend and he says there might be a nice surprise up to MS 66 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1541 Posts |
I checked with the seller about the picture and he said they're photographed pictures. I'll include my picture when I receive it. Does anyone think this coin is dipped?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts |
Hi Shatsi
I dont see anything that makes me think the coin has been dipped at least recently,,Copper does not dip well and usually will turn out an un natural color, the pics show a coin that is to the red side of RB to me,,
The only reason I didnt put a higher grade on it is due to what I see as a weakness in the strike, if the curls to the right of the ribbon and the ear were a little stronger and the ribbon at the bottom of the reverse details was a little sharper the coin would go to a 66 possibly one higher but to me that is getting beyond my feeble grading skills.
Its a very pretty coin ,, and in hand I'm sure the luster and detail maybe better than a pic can illustrate.
Rick
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Belgium
2078 Posts |
My american retired coinseller friend send me following Photograde lists the highest points on this coin as "above the ear" (presumably they're referring to that lock of hair that covers the top of the ear - that's common of a lot of US coins) and the "lowest curl of hair". I can see just enough slide in those areas that they appear to have been affected but not worn at all. I don't see any slide on the cheek. The tips of the feathers look like they might have gotten a bit of slide but according to the book they're lower than the points I mentioned above. . The book says the highest points on the reverse are the "highest points of leaves and ribbon bow". Further, the book says not to use the "diamond designs on the ribbon" because they were commonly poorly struck and that's apparently what was affected.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts |
The Diamonds on the ribbon are of an Incuse design and can show well below XF grade (similar to the liberty on the Morgan dollars) This is the reason they are not used for Mint State grading of the indian head,, The high points that were mentioned by ageka are correct with the addition of the curl to the right of the ear. The slightly flat appearance to the right of the ear and the lowest curl to the right of the ribbon ,with no wear evident on the curl above the ear, determined my reasoning of a strike anomoly and not wear. Rick
|
|
Valued Member
United States
411 Posts |
Taking into account my inexperience in general and my lesser inexperience with copper, I don't see any wear. It seemed a weak strike to me, especially the ear curl and the apparant mushiness of the wreath. If it's a better strike, I think it could go to MS65 or even higher. If it's a dull strike, I still think it's a very attractive coin and, if graded as a 64, it would probably fetch a star from NGC, if they had graded it. Put it this way: I wouldn't turn it away for eating cracker (ancient chinese proverb via the Marx Brothers).
|
|
Valued Member
United States
363 Posts |
I'm with Morgan Fred on this one in that it's just impossible for me to grade accurately this higher grade of coin from a photo or scan. But, it is fun! My guess is always anywhere from AU 58 to MS 64 or higher! I have enough trouble with those grades with the coin right in my hand! I suppose if a person has seen enough scans and photos though, you begin to get better at it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Belgium
2078 Posts |
Well me and my friend have goldgrading from 300 dpi scan down to an art Grading from foto's is a lot more difficult because slight cleaning can be glared out and slight wear can be lighted out etc When a coin is offered on foto I allways ask for a scan and if refuses I nearly never bid 
|
|
Forum Mom
  United States
5877 Posts |
If the pictures supplied are not scans, I have to say that it takes the coin out of the BU category as the luster simply is not present to warrant it. I am looking forward to Shatsi's opinion when she receives it. So many things look better on the coin than in a pic.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts |
We have as diverse opinions on this IHC than on most other coins put up for our grading review, ranging from AU to MS-66 with everything in between. This is exciting and fun! I can't wait to see how it will actually grade out. Fred
|
|
Forum Mom
  United States
5877 Posts |
Shatsi got the coin and here is a b/w scan of it. It is my opinion that the pics were doctored for the auction and that this coin has definitely been cleaned. There is also a very visible fingerprint on the Indian. 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts |
What a rip-off! I might presume the seller has no return policy since altering the coin images and no return go hand in hand. Is shatsi willing to post the auction or seller's username so we know who to add to the "avoid' list?
Fred
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1541 Posts |
The seller has solid refund policy, I've already notified him and he's mailing a refund for the total including s/h. Has great feedback. Maybe it was just my luck. Here the seller id: genlee79
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts |
Good thing on his return policy. I'm happy that you're not going to get burned on the coin, shatsi. I looked at some of his previous auctions and he seems to be a grand master of image doctoring - his images are beautiful! I'm surprised he hasn't received any negative nor neutral feedbacks, but if his return policy is so good and he honors it so well, then must be he just puts the photoshopped coins out there and hopes somebody will eventually buy and keep them. Here's another example: a great looking image of a 3-cent piece that, knowing what I know now, might not pass muster once in hand: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...m=8349367335Fred
|
|
Forum Mom
  United States
5877 Posts |
There really isn't any risk purchasing from him since his return policy is unconditional and he refunds s/h. I do think this particular coin is overgraded. Take a look at the cheek.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,847 |
Page 2 of 2
|