| Author |
 Replies: 22 / Views: 2,183 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
New Member
 United States
13 Posts |
 Here is the obverse of theach coin, it was up before but it switch to reverse somehow. |
|
New Member
United States
13 Posts |
Everytime I go to post the obverse the reverse shows up instead even though I know for 100% fact that it's right.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
It's not cleaned imo. Probably a 64 maybe a 65. The cheek if really clean can make it a 65.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11917 Posts |
Picture of reverse is blurry but from what I can see looks like 65.
IN NECESSARIIS UNITAS - IN DUBIIS LIBERTAS - IN OMNIBUS CARITAS THE MAN IN THE ARENA, Theodore Roosevelt at the Sorbonne Paris on April 23, 1910: " It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat." My coin website: https://fairfaxcoins.com |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
Doesn't look cleaned. Not a 66. Maybe 65, but more likely a 64.
Keep in mind that if you ever want to sell this coin, that slab will make it harder to sell to a segment of the collecting populace.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
 , With moxking . |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
I would avoid this coin like the plague, simply because the owner of NNC is notorious for doctoring damaged coins and severely over grading them. 1882 isn't a particularly rare date, so I'm sure you can find an example you like in a PCGS or NGC holder.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agreed. I see this as closer to a 64 than a 65.  to the CCF! Edited by Coinfrog
01/16/2017 4:36 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18720 Posts |
i agree with the MS64 grade and since this is a common date coin would look elsewhere. they can do amazing things to cover up using lighting and angles.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
484 Posts |
Looks Unc.....lots of scuffs in left obverse. Not MS66 by any means.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3479 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
MS64, original, close to MS65. Not TERRIBLE for an NNC coin.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
Doesn't look as though it has been cleaned to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6398 Posts |
I like it as an MS-64. Looks original and not cleaned and might be a good deal at maybe $35-40. However, it could have edge damage not visible in the holder. NNC is notorious for slabbing edge-damaged coins as problem-free.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
304 Posts |
MS-63, the cheek has a lot of marks
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 22 / Views: 2,183 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 01/16/2017 10:09 am
