| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 4,206 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2023 Posts |
I went with "top" but it really depends on the lighting of the coins and the degree of toning on them. Grant looks great on the top, but so does Monroe on the bottom. The other two directed my choice, and that was almost a coin toss (so to speak).
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Is that a rim Cud on the 1938? I voted top row. John1  Edited by John1
11/04/2017 05:02 am
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
I like the top row too. I might experiment with expanding the black ring a hair more, too.
You need to start your digialbum business soon. Let me know when you do.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4038 Posts |
I voted bottom. IMO the top draws too much attention to the album, and away from the coin. The smoothness of the bottom, and the less dramatic shadowing, draw attention to the coin, and also look more real, less computer-drawn.
Contact me for photographic equipment or visit my home page at: http://macrocoins.com |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9395 Posts |
I voted for the bottom version -- it seems to be slightly ahead in the poll at this point.
My own virtual/digital 7070 has nothing showing around the coin, as long as the coin is exactly round.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Top row openings seem to "frame" the coins better.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
 My vote goes to the top row. |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3058 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
10197 Posts |
Bottom, looks like its really mounted. Top looks like a rattler slab, not my poison.
|
|
New Member
Greece
45 Posts |
None of the above.
Both are confusing. The black on the top (for both) and the super white where the "circles" end at bottom, confuses the coins.
I would prefer an equally grey (18% :) ) tone for both. I do not mind about the holes but for the gradient shadow.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8518 Posts |
Bottom
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12477 Posts |
What really matters is what your customer prefers.  I'm viewing it as a comparison to something physical so, the bottom row looks like coins sitting on top of a mat. The upper row looks like coins embedded in a holder/album. I do think that the top row's border could benefit from the gradient not getting so white at the bottom. That's where the "computer" aspect jumps in and you see the fine artificial line on the underside of the coins. It could be less white but still lighter than the background. If you want to get really fancy, adjust the border gradient orientation to match the lighting angle of the coin image. The 1922 Grant is pretty close to that. The Hawaiian's border would have to be rotated CCW to match. In Memory of Crazyb0 12-26-1951 to 7-27-2020
In Memory of Tootallious 3-31-1964 to 4-15-2020
In Memory of T-BOP 10-12-1949 to 1-19-2024
Edited by spru
11/07/2017 03:11 am
|
|
Moderator
United States
189340 Posts |
Quote:
I voted bottom. IMO the top draws too much attention to the album, and away from the coin. The smoothness of the bottom, and the less dramatic shadowing, draw attention to the coin, and also look more real, less computer-drawn. I could not have said it better.  |
|
Valued Member
Canada
125 Posts |
Definitely the bottom. The shadow is softer and much less harsh for the eyes to deal with.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
97 Posts |
The bottom is easier on the eyes.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 4,206 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 11/04/2017 05:02 am
