| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 3,363 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2815 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188770 Posts |
Very interesting!  Thank you for the article link. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10284 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
You gotta have one of these, jbuck!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2815 Posts |
Could it be one of those prototype strikes? I wonder who nabbed it. If it does turn out to be a packaged prototype we'll be hearing about it soon enough. Based on the photos, the earth looks standard, but if memory serves, some key diagnostics are on the obverse.
Edited by Darth Morgan
02/28/2018 11:18 am
|
|
Moderator
United States
188770 Posts |
Quote:
You gotta have one of these, jbuck! Perhaps.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10284 Posts |
I am skeptical of this listing as well as the LBJ Kennedy mentioned in the other post. Not something I would gamble on as being legit. It wouldn't surprise me if the same typewriter was used for both letters.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2815 Posts |
OK, I've compared the seller photos with the photos on the Ike Group report, and I don't think this can be a prototype strike. I'm basing this solely on the earth. The islands are clearly visible in the seller's close-up photo. On the prototype, the islands are virtually nonexistent. The earth looks more like a round blob with muted features. However, that doesn't mean this coin couldn't potentially be some new, undiscovered mule. Wishful thinking on my part, but comparison of the obverse features are inconclusive based on the photos provided, at least for me they are. Here's the link to the official Ike Group photos. Scroll down to Section 2 (page 28) on the Chatham Prototype (71-S Business Issue): http://www.ikegroup.info/chapter34/chapter34.pdfEdited by Darth Morgan
02/28/2018 12:49 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2815 Posts |
Quote:
I am skeptical of this listing as well as the LBJ Kennedy mentioned in the other post. Not something I would gamble on as being legit. It wouldn't surprise me if the same typewriter was used for both letters. I must agree. I don't have a good feeling about this one. At first I was really wishing I had had a shot at it, but not anymore- not after making a few comparisons. |
|
Moderator
United States
188770 Posts |
Good work, Darth. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2023 Posts |
Quote:
It wouldn't surprise me if the same typewriter was used for both letters. Not the same typewriter, IMO. The LBJ letter has a fairly weak strike on the descending letters and the letters are slightly rounded. The Nixon letter has evenly-struck letters which are more square. It's weird to me, though, that the Nixon letter is allegedly signed by a Congressman but is on White House letterhead. Edit, to correct the last paragraph -- I misinterpreted the Congressman as the sender, not the recipient. That would explain the letterhead. Edited by Alpha2814
02/28/2018 8:41 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
434 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10284 Posts |
I suppose "Tricky Dick" could have said " I think I'll have my secretary send out a bunch of theses dollars to people, maybe it will help me get re-elected. " A PR thing. All he had to do was use that shortened signature. Perhaps it's legit. I just wonder why I didn't get one.  |
|
Valued Member
United States
434 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
United States
188770 Posts |
Outstanding!  |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 3,363 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 02/28/2018 10:08 am
