Well I pulled the coin from the auction and will keep it forever with the other 5 I won't sell of these from different sources, not to worry. Hate to see a coin of mine discussed as fake especially on a forum I advertise on, but either way, there is such an open debate in my mind about these Histiaia coins of this type. First, for any expert to say there was never a die with this hair style and pellet I never liked. There is just no humility accepting the original forger might have copied an existing but still rare coin die type. You just know this is all beyond the electronic curtain of history, we have can't possibly say this as men of a science etc. Second, the world triggers on Histiaia for extra scrutiny and I am to the point that if I see a lot from Austria of greek silver for a grand I turn away if I see any Histiaia as real or not you don't want the hassle of dealing with them anymore. That is a shame. So can I find a bunch of these with this hair style and pellet type from a bunch of auction houses on past sales of acsearch? Sure. Can I quote the messages I sent to Roma and others about these coins and their understanding but ambiguity about if they want to discredit all of these with this hair style and pellets? Sure again. It is just frustrating the whole Histiaia mess, especially for the people who collect this city. There just is no room for debate, people are quoting the Torah when they say there never way this hair style in history. We used to make Laws in science and now people get upset as we call global warming a theory because hey it is just a theory. We just don't make laws anymore as science is just much more humble then it used to be. The ancient Coin World can have a very valid theory that there never was ever a die in ancient times with this hair style and pellet type. They just can't say that for certain and they really need more disclaimers in my opinion.
Global warming is not a theory... in scientific lingo a theory meets the highest possible standards of evidence, climate change has very little consensus regarding the amount of influence mankind is having and what the consequences of them are... also consider that since only one side of the debate is financed it has become very politicized, people keep banding around a debunked figure of 97% of scientists agree yet agreeing the climate changes is hardly confirming what role we play in the numerous causes and influences and 30k scientists have signed a petition against it if you polls these you get an entirey different % - what I am saying is that it is a hypothesis not a theory, an important distinction to make.
I agree though that it is hard to have absolute certainty about these coin matters though, we have to go with the balance of probabilities which makes it rather subjective.
Thanks Bob for your opinion on my coin, I was a bit of a nervous buyer on this one but I got it from a good seller.
I hear what you're saying, Joe. That why I stated, "Even if Barry Murphy is correct..." and "if the coin is bad" - the pertinent word there being "if." He does have tons of experience with ancients but, then, there have been plenty of mistakes made (on both sides of authenticity debates) by guys with similar tons of experience.
What I really meant was people compare, without knowing it, the legal system with science. In the legal system you notice something, make a theory of who did the crime, and then gather evidence. In science we notice something, make a hypothesis, then gather evidence. Only at the end of a series of experiments we call it a theory. Now as for global warming a bad thing? Here is an amazing video you might want to watch.
YCcLggcPcj0
*** Edited by Staff to add YouTube tags. [youtube][/youtube] Please use them in the future. We prefer embedded video. ***
My doctorate is environmental chemistry and I show this in class sometimes in a topic course. It is a UK fellow who you might know.
Well anyone can certify anything I suppose. That guy who famously on ebay lists coins high, cuts them down then takes "low" offers has one of these exact types, (much rougher) he says was $650 slashed to $250 with make offer and the condition and roughness he'll probably take $50 for a coin he paid $5 for and send a very official certificate to the unlucky buyer. Sadly it is exactly the same now famously "discredited" die set. I am just going to try to steer clear of Histiaia for a long while. Just such a mess.
I am well aware of much of the content of that video hence my sentence about no consensus about the consequences... but lets not diverge into a political minefield.
With regards to certification it always makes me laugh when people place grave importance on a "Certificate of authentication" which is not worth the paper it is written on. I am not one that trusts the authority of anybody on any topic unless their argumentation and evidence is sound. It is true that a little knowledge is dangerous and mistakes are possible but the coin itself must be testament to its own authenticity the piece of paper or even the encasement from a third party cannot be trusted in my opinion.
I have no doubt at all that Barry Murphy is probably right on most if not all of the coins he includes in the image he put up long ago as you say and that his expert credentials are as strong as they can be. But if he can not say he personally knew the forger who showed him he indeed created out of thin air this style I don't respectfully know how he can say there was never an original coin of this style that was copied. That level of certainty that there was never a coin with this particular hair style and pellets is quite amazing to be sure of. Perhaps he is referencing that none of this style were ever found or more correctly seen before the forger arrived on the scene. That he can say based on countless year of study of the coin series before this forger event was noted. But I certainly feel bad for any of these with this style, even less than 1% of all those out there, that might be real and are darned completely because of the style.
OK question: This coin I can't do much with. Just gonna hold it forever. And Barry Murphy says that hair and pellet patter never occurred in real coins. So before I do this I'd like an opinion please sir: If I very carefully document myself breaking the coin in half modern silver should look like modern silver. But what if I broke it in half and saw crystallized silver as you see with ancient coins that break? Or would people just say obviously the forger took a real ancient piece of silver and pressed an image on it or something else I can't even imagine? Hate to do this so famously, film myself doing it, and have people just say that was completely silly to do, we all know it is a darned coin period just give it up etc. Am I crazy? In fact if this was a modern fake, would it even break? Or deform instead like a metal? The coin is useless to me anyway. Can we just sacrifice it to the Gods of science this way?
Joe, the coin is of course yours to do with what you want. Sounds like you don't maintain a "black cabinet" as some dealers do.
Your previous post suggests that despite Barry's misgivings (I saw he has at least one more from that die on the page Warren linked to), you still feel the coin may be kosher. If that's your position, then why not just add it to your personal collection and feel good about it? I don't think that would constitute "uselessness."
Or you could just stick to your guns and list it. I've seen plenty of listings through the years that were up front regarding alternative opinions about the authenticity of the lot for sale - they typically include a reasoned argument for authenticity by the dealer, alongside an acknowledgement that alternate opinions exist (or may exist). To cite just a few:
https://cNGCoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=76715 ("Although the pieces could be the product of a more modern manufacture, the characteristics of their flans and state of preservation strongly suggest they are ancient.")
https://cNGCoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=309399 ("...Recognizing that the coins were metallurgically compatible with the ingots, rather than the coins from these cities, he (H.S. Kim) suggests that a modern forger probably made the coins from the ingots to increase the value of the hoard...We would propose a different interpretation. The differences in style and fabric that he noted are not dispositive; these coins are products of a mint that previously had only...Thus, these differences could easily be explained by the coins being a novel production at a mint not well versed in electrum production...")
We've probably all seen lots of these types of listings through the years, from good dealers like these two. The fact that they are up front like this adds to their credibility, imo.
Anyway, I'll be curious to hear what you decide. Best wishes.
To rephrase the question, first let me say that when you noted, "Sounds like you don't maintain a "black cabinet" as some dealers do. " the photo below is all fake. I certainly do have a black cabinet I use for talks at the Temple etc about coins, but again to rephrase the question, I can't sell the coin, so I should just break it no problem, but I do again want to ask: Before I break it, if I find crystallized silver and it breaks like an ancient coin does that mean to you it was indeed ancient or was that silly as no matter what I try, x-ray fluorescence at work for example, this is just darned goods and no chemistry or experiment will ever change that opinion of the community? What do you expect to see if I try to break it Bob?
Well, Joe, I have no idea what others would conclude from your proposed experiment, but I would likely see, well, just a broken coin. I'd be dependent on (and very interested in) your own empirical observations and conclusions. I think it would make for a very interesting paper or article, actually.
Well there would have to be some parameters and a decent plan. I'd have to have a control for example of something modern etc. My research students are using a decent microscope set up in the lab for some tar sands works right now but as they say, for every hour of lab work there is 2 hours of planning. I was kind of hoping there would be a "if I see blank that means modern" etc. But if breaking a modern pressed fake and an ancient coin would show the same things that would not lead to a good plan for me. So many ancients of silver break crystallized and are not repairable at all as they come apart in a few smaller pieces easily. Like I expect if there were an ancient flan it would not bend at all, just break easily with force. Hate to plan an experiment and it mean nothing etc.
Twenty five years ago I took a metals class and determined to cast an 18k gold ring for myself. With a portrait stolen off of a denarius of Augustus.
Everything went fine but I soon realized that 18k does have certain drawbacks notably that it scratches and 'dings' rather easily. Having had a background in hardware manufacture I settled on a simple solution. Heat treatment to harden the gold alloy. I found a book in the public library (no internet back then !) and pulled a nice recipe for the heat treatment of gold alloys. Again all good and well ! After giving my beautiful ring of Augustus the required bake in the oven I proceed to quench it. The ring immediately fractured in the cold water. Close examination showed a lovely crystalline structure inside the band. My lesson learned I had to remake my wax ring and repeat the entire process over. In 14k gold !!! Silver can also be heat treated to a crystalline state. In my opinion your experiment will not be very conclusive.
BTW Is the earth round like a ball ? Or is that just a theory ? I heard once (long ago) that it sits on top of a giant turtle
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use