| Author |
 Replies: 36 / Views: 7,033 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
92 Posts |
 "I myself believe" this to be yes silver but a "sandcast" mold/molded coin by the appearance of the surfaces. Also note on the first pic from the bottom edge of the coin, about a third of the way up the edge looks to be were the two molds 1/2's were joined as the line runs (from what the pic shows) consistently around the circumference of coins edge...the whole way? and the reedings ("denticles"?) all of them do not look to line up perfectly. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4692 Posts |
with maineway. I also noticed the denticles don't look right. |
|
New Member
 United States
2 Posts |
Thank You all for the advice. will take to a few more people before I send. appreciate it it  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Weight is correct (within tolerance) for a copper nickel clad quarter.
Since an XRF gun has a limited penetration if the piece is plated with pure silver the gun is going to read mostly silver and most of what would get picked up from the subsurface would be copper So I could believe a 90% silver reading on a plated piece. The key is what was the other 10%? All copper, or was there also nickel as well?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
292 Posts |
There was indeed a 1972 silver quarter posted on this exact forum years ago. It was struck over an actual 1964 silver quarter, already struck, probably made by a rogue employee. No one believed it but it turned out to be genuine and got NGC slabbed. This doesn't look like it was struck over an already struck coin, but considering we know a 1972 silver quarter exists now I'm not gonna call it impossible. This one looks cast or pitted at best though. No idea why one would fake a 1972 quarter, so it could also be a bad plating job. Interested to see where this goes though.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3184 Posts |
send it to NGC, PCGS, or ANACs and have then determine!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
461 Posts |
Just because the dealer has been in business for over 30 years doesn't mean he is an expert in the error field. The vast majority are not. I am certain this coin is fake, either plated or cast. The surfaces looks corroded. The XRF gun is really only reliable for surface metal. You can send in to a grading service but you will be wasting your money. But if that is what it takes to satisfy you, I am all for it. If there is a larger coin show in your area, take it there and seek out a dealer that specializes in errors for your best advice.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
75050 Posts |
Looks like a cast as mentioned. I wouldn't waste your money on getting it graded.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
If you don't want to send it to a TPG without being really sure run a specific gravity test on it. The SG of copper nickel clad and 90% silver are different enough that you should be able to tell. |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8939 Posts |
I wonder what happened with this thread....
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Maybe OP found out the coin wasn't silver after all .  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Reviewing the first images, it looks like a sand cast quarter. The edge would show us more if that was so. The reeds would look strange.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
366 Posts |
a one and done poster - seems to be a lot of them in here lately.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
24885 Posts |
 To the Forum. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4692 Posts |
Quote:
a one and done poster - seems to be a lot of them in here lately. We seem to be overdue for a "found in grandpa's attic" poster with some poorly made cast tourist coins. |
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 36 / Views: 7,033 |
Page 3 of 3
|
First Page
Previous Page
Posted 09/23/2018 2:12 pm
