| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,054 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
|
|
New Member
United States
22 Posts |
63 maybe 64, I think it's a 63 With nice eye appeal
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1529 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
314 Posts |
I'll reveal the answer in a day, I will say the coin looks a tad nicer in hand
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1023 Posts |
MS63 but lacking eye appeal for me. Might be the photos making the obverse look a little dead to my eyes.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
900 Posts |
I'd guess 63. Nice strike, but lots of hits in the fields.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3473 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
271 Posts |
Was thinking 64 but I think this is a 65, very nice coin
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
314 Posts |
A few of you got it, I can see the argument for either 64 or 65 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5029 Posts |
Nice coin. I like the subtle toning as well.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
I like the coin, but not at 65 because of the field mark in front of the chin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
747 Posts |
Nice, I would have guessed 63/64 but I don't like toning. That drags it down for me.
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
314 Posts |
To each his own I guess. I find the subtle golden toning appealing
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,054 |
Page 2 of 2
|