| Author |
 Replies: 22 / Views: 4,883 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
Those pictures are a prime example of just how good an AU-58 can be. Without seeing the slab I would have been guessing MS-something. And the "something" would have been up around 65. Mine is an MS-63 and I don't have a picture of it. It and all of its FE and IHC friends are in a bank safe deposit box. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1005 Posts |
This thread is so confusing I have no idea what's going on
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1378 Posts |
Don't worry about it llewellin....and kanga...very nice....they jump in price at MS-63 or MS in general. that's a real good one.....keep em safe there....I only like to have a handful out at a time before going back in to the banks....When I get rid of this one, it will be with the upgrade of the coin to the next level....hopefully a 63.....somewhere in the $900 $1100 range....when I get better shots of the obverse one day I'll see what you think then and others as well....maybe it needs to be cracked and resubmitted to PCGS....but that's for another time and a consensus on the grade will be needed.
Edited by DoctorBurnzy
02/02/2019 11:45 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12477 Posts |
@DoctorBurnzy I believe you are creating confusion when you say you are posting "stock photos." Stock photos would be a generic representation of the coin you purchased and useless here. What you have posted are the "seller's photos." Big difference.From now on, if the pics are of the actual coin you purchased but the pics are not yours, use "seller's pics" or something to that effect, not "stock."  In Memory of Crazyb0 12-26-1951 to 7-27-2020
In Memory of Tootallious 3-31-1964 to 4-15-2020
In Memory of T-BOP 10-12-1949 to 1-19-2024
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1378 Posts |
You're right....they are the original seller's photos...I have a bunch of those...I really don't like to use them unless I have to......and I will add my own to them at some point to a post if I do use them....just to show true ownership...and perhaps to get a better photo if I think I can do it.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Spruett is spot-on.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
Quote:
This thread is so confusing I have no idea what's going on I agree with you on that one. I'm really not sure what this is about. Nice coin though. |
|
Valued Member
United States
291 Posts |
|
|
CCF Advertiser
United States
1533 Posts |
GC and HA often take really good photos and I have no problem using them, most of the time. There are, however, times when I feel I can and have done better. When I get a coin I bought and it looks better in hand, that is an indication I can probably do better with my rig than GC or HA did in the 10 s they spent imaging my coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8938 Posts |
At this point I am so lost I have no clue what's going on. So let me just jump in with this, pretty coin!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36828 Posts |
Great looking coin no matter who's photos they are.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4692 Posts |
AU-58 coins often are "interchangeable" with MS-62 coins, especially if they have a CAC sticker. Tough to tell from pictures, but reverse has a bit of a mushy look.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote:
AU-58 coins often are "interchangeable" with MS-62 coins, especially if they have a CAC sticker. More like 63/64 especially with CAC. 61/62 are usually more like 53/55s At least now a days anyway. |
|
Valued Member
United States
170 Posts |
Looks great regardless of the AU or MS discussion. Proud piece of history.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189142 Posts |
 to the Community, river4449! |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 22 / Views: 4,883 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 02/02/2019 10:17 pm
