| Author |
 Replies: 22 / Views: 3,294 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5324 Posts |
Great this is a cool note, if my memory is correct a CBC reporter after the event asked one of the BOC people to exchange one of these note and she complied and there you have it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9864 Posts |
The letter really verifies a claim which many collectors would be skeptical of without support. Thanks for sharing this item.  "Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
104 Posts |
thanks DBM I think I have all the facts
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2576 Posts |
Wow! What an amazing note to own.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
104 Posts |
I am almost certain that is one of a kind. that went out 17 years ago.
Regent LM59 Canadian paper money society
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
104 Posts |
JOHN100 I am not sure if the reporter was a woman ,but the letter of the bank of Canada was sent to a man
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5324 Posts |
The reporter was a man and if I remember the story correctly a female BOC employee exchanged the note, what ever the circumstance you have most likely the only prefix JHS note
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
104 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
387 Posts |
While the catalog lists this as an experimental note prepared for internal use, reading the letter it would seem that this note was genuine. The letter makes no mention of it being experimental or for internal use.
The letter says it was part of the first print run of the new note. I am wondering it has all the features of the regularly circulated note.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
104 Posts |
yes, all the features are there , you can see that the serial numbers are always the same , even on the last ten dollar . they are using only that number
for all the new issues
Regent LM59 canadian paper money society
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2576 Posts |
I suspect "Paisa" is curious about the security features & FPN & BPN.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
104 Posts |
everything is there, FPN #98 BPN #12 golden leaves
regent LM59 canadian paper money society
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
387 Posts |
Quote:
even on the last ten dollar . they are using only that number
for all the new issues In all the marketing material the BoC is using JHS prefix. It must have some significance. However I do not believe that unlike the $5 note that is the talk of this discussion the more recent notes are actually printed with JHS. This prefix is only used in marketing and artistic renders of the notes. If you watch very closely the notes that are in the hands of people have prefixes such as FFB, BSW, FTH, HBG etc. So the $5 JHS should really be considered a circulating note and should have a catalog number of its own IMHO. It is definitely not experimental. It would be a circulation trial. |
|
Valued Member
Canada
104 Posts |
Paisa check on the back, of this year, CGPM you will find the same number and tha same prefix ,on the new 10$. If all there notes have the same number.
It is hard to give them the name of "circulation trial"
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
387 Posts |
Quote:
Paisa check on the back, of this year, CGPM you will find the same number and tha same prefix ,on the new 10$. If all there notes have the same number.
It is hard to give them the name of "circulation trial" The note at the back of the latest 2019 Charlton book is an artistic rendered note and not a real note. The note that is $5 pre-security is a real note and I think it would have been part of a print/circulation trial and there would have been more notes like that and one got out. I have been monitoring the release of polymer notes. Every time a polymer note is coming out they still use the JHS prefix and number in the artistic render but the one they physically show at the events is not JHS as seen from photos taken at the events. |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 22 / Views: 3,294 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 03/24/2019 6:27 pm
