| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 2,122 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4404 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
664 Posts |
Nice find Daves Errors  |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74455 Posts |
Great find!
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Not a match to 014, but very close.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3003 Posts |
Coop
The comparison looks like the right picture is a little bit high. Can we get a comparison with the right picture where the mintmark falls inside the red lines?
THanks
EDIT: wait.. then the DATE drops too much.. never mind
Edited by levelsofmadnes
04/25/2019 2:12 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
But if I raised the right image, then the mint mark would still be even further north. It is the one on the left that is too low. The difference between the red and yellow line is how much the image on the left is lower. Do you know what the white lines on these images are for? To make sure the overall size of the date devices are the same size vertically. Then I add the color lines after it is correct on the white lines.
Edited by coop
04/25/2019 2:16 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1566 Posts |
Coop is right the strike is almost flat like MD Doubling but the Main D has not takes a hit its normal. That's why I could not find one like it the FLAT D ...  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1566 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1566 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
But I would not say that is is not a RPM, just not the 014. I've seen RPMs that are flat. MD can affect one area devices, but I'm not seeing any other area that show the same MD in that area. So this first punching may have been shallow and thus the weaker, flat area in question. But the punch was used just once to create the mintmarks. There may have been several hits used to make it deep, thus some RPMs look larger and smaller than others, as they were not punch as deep/shallow into the dies. Sometimes RPMs are considered a match, but are actually a different die. I've found that in the past on a different die. The locations were very close, but on the new example it was not triple mintmark, but a different triple mintmark. (It may have been this same year) It was sold to me as a certain RPM number, but it wasn't that die number. (I found them) Mine was a new listing, the 027. 1953S-1MM-019 S/S/S http://www.coppercoins.com/lincoln/...ie_state=lds1953S-1MM-027 S/S/S http://www.coppercoins.com/lincoln/...ie_state=mdsHere is the side by side:  So keep it safe. Someday it might be listed. (Or submit it to Wiles?) Edited by coop
04/25/2019 6:38 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5780 Posts |
Nice comparison images and explanation, as usual, of the use of the white lines for OP's coin.
One question about the thread title though, isn't this a variety, not an error?
Words of encouragement are one of the major food groups.
We need to consume them regularly to thrive and grow.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
I feel it is a variety. Just not a listed one yet.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1910 Posts |
this looks pretty close---http://www.coppercoins.com/lincoln/diestate.php?date=1953&die_id=1953d1mm014&die_state=eds
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5780 Posts |
Mikev, yours is 1MM-014 which is the same one in Coops comparison image (RPM-014), with the lines that didn't quite line up.
Very slight difference between the OP's coin and 1MM-014. But I'm guessing if it gets sent in it might come back as this variety because it's so close.
Words of encouragement are one of the major food groups.
We need to consume them regularly to thrive and grow.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,122 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 04/25/2019 07:13 am
