| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 3,144 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
you can find the QX-5 and QX-3 on ebay allot of times cheaper than online stores, so if you are not concerned about buying on ebay you may want to check that out as well when you do the searching |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1353 Posts |
Is thee a big difference between the QX-5 and QX-3?
I want to take pix of my coins to post on forum.
Thanks
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
2830 Posts |
G'day IC, look at Item number: 220180615888 on ebay. Sounds a lot like what you are discussing. I'm in Darwin, so I don't expect to be able to look at one of these any time soon. But the shop is near my sister's home, so next time I visit her, I hope to have a look. I've just joined my local Camera Club, so at our next meeting, I intend to ask if anyone else has experienced one of these, or similar. What I have learned so far is that coin photography is best with optical zoom, not digital. My Canon is described as "10x digital zoom, and 3x optical zoom". I can take good pics at 3x, but above that, they are very blurry. You see the item on ebay talks about "130 magnification", and "5x optical zoom". I know just enought to be confused, so I will be interested to read what others contribute to this thread. Peter in Darwin, Oz |
|
Valued Member
 Australia
52 Posts |
Hi Peter Thomas, I thought I could pick the accent. I have placed a bid on ebay for a similar model and should have it soon (next month or so). When I receive it I hope to post more details and if it is half as good as I think it will be I will be as happy as the proverbial pig in ****. regards |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1353 Posts |
Edited by murty
08/27/2008 07:50 am
|
|
Valued Member
United States
295 Posts |
49$ sure is a great price! Its too bad they dont give us examples of what it can produce.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
442 Posts |
I've got the QX3. Have had it for years.
As mentioned the 60X is more than adequate. I believe the lighting is better on a QX5.
A great "toy" and reasonably priced.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2669 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1353 Posts |
xshift,
Are you saying the minimum is 100x and it won't be good for putting coins on forums?
Thanks
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
Quote:
Is thee a big difference between the QX-5 and QX-3?
The QX3 is an old version that was manufactured by Intel and the newer QX5 is now manufactured by a company called Digital Blue Edited by biokemist6
08/27/2008 1:17 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2669 Posts |
Murty.. right, the 100x is just TOO magnified. I figure the 40x minimum I just got should be a ton better (on top of being able to see through a viewer as well as a computer cam - it has both, and the 100x minimum doesn't. That doesn't matter to some, though). I should have looked into the QX5 first, as it looks like it has a 10x, which was what I really wanted to begin with.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2669 Posts |
Here's my first real attempt at the lowest setting (40x) on this microscope, just to give an idea of the kind of pics it takes. It's the 4 in "1941" on a Lincoln Cent:  If I got much closer I'd be able to see the verdigris smiling at me (yikes)! The specific model is Celestron 44320 Microscope Digital Kit MDK. |
|
Valued Member
Australia
52 Posts |
I did win (win?) a zoom digital microscope on ebay for $49.99 plus $24.99 shipping (yeah sure) and I soon as it gets here I will post a report for all concerned. Until then. regards |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
860 Posts |
On a previous thread I lamented the problems of my chinese digital microscope's ability and photo quality. I still lament the magnification, and field size. The magnification which can go from about 25 -100 depending on the focus distance is such that only the smallest of coins can be shown whole. But it is great for the "details" I so enjoy. The last problem I solved by dumping the software provided which I could only use *deleted* words to describe and went to Corel Paint Shop Pro X2 which allowed direct import of my digital microscope and allowed the marvelous control of the image. here is a current example. So if the image looks very bad and "blooms" ( whites out) see if your paint or photoshop type of program allows direct import. I really endorse the corel product. My digital microscope is like this one http://cgi.ebay.com/200X-1-3-Mega-P...pe_W0QQitemZ200249930401QQihZ010QQcategoryZ48741QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem Jim example:  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1353 Posts |
if I understand all of the feedback the QX-5 won't take a complete image of coins larger then a dime, or am I wrong?
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 3,144 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 08/26/2008 8:35 pm
