| Author |
 Replies: 21 / Views: 5,725 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5318 Posts |
Mark, my overlay supports your conclusions. The legend on the obverse simply is in the wrong location to create such marks from a clash. I'm more confident than ever this is a doubled die--thanks again for your input.  Here is my overlay. I re-shot the coin to ensure the scale between obverse/reverse was very close. Fortunately, two denticles almost exactly align obv/rev--the result should be fairly accurate:  Obverse as reference for devices:  Edited by KurtS
10/27/2008 12:30 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1571 Posts |
Not being familiar with the "Aussie" coinage, I was not aware of the "doubling" on the chest area of the 'roo. The only area that I could comment on is the "ASTR", where the top of the portrait is, but that doesn't correspond. No idea, other than a doubling of some sort. Nice job of making the overlay, Kurt!
Dick
Edited by livingdinasaur
10/27/2008 01:07 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
Judging from the last overlay, a die clash seems unlikely, but what about a DDR? Can an overlay confirm the positions of these secondary features? To that end, I've created one more overlay using the same reverse photo without speculating on distortions which may happen in a double-hubbing--only rotation of the secondary reverse image. On this new overlay, I see many consistencies to the marks on this coin.  Take a close look, keeping in mind that the secondary marks are doubled too. I've also included a clean reverse image if anyone would like to create their own overlay.   Edited by KurtS
10/27/2008 01:59 am
|
|
Valued Member
119 Posts |
Some very nice work there Kurt. I am quite sure you are perfectly correct about the DDR. When creating a die, the first blow from the transfer punch only created an imprint roughly 3/4 of the way out to the rim (which is why the 1933/2 overdate penny only shows the top of the 2 - the dies were created by one blow from a 1932 dated transfer punch and then two form a 1933 dated punch). I have some of these 1956Y pennies with the doubling at work. I'll have a look at them and see if they show all the details that you coin does. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
Thanks thesandpit--I guess I covered most details. And how interesting...thanks for the information on the 1933/2 overdate! That's a coin I'm trying to "noodle"--maybe at the next coin show. Yes--let me know how your 1956Y. compares to this one--thanks! Edited by KurtS
10/27/2008 3:14 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2669 Posts |
Hi Kurt, Great coin! The lettering shows characteristics of this one: http://triton.vg/P60-63.html theorized to be a triple punch (your "double nose" you're looking for  ). |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
Xshift, exactly--the doubling and spread on that documented DDO strongly suggest a similar process at work here (imo) |
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1295 Posts |
Yes the double nose. Here's my favourite one.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
Beautiful toned penny--and very dramatic offset punch--thanks for showing that one; another I'm trying to "noodle".
Fortunately I have a good head for storing details....someday it will burst, lol.
|
|
Formerly nancyc
Australia
5385 Posts |
markn, Nice 'ghost' image on the reverse as well.
life is a mystery to be lived not a problem to be solved
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
Here, I also wonder if one did an overlay of the obverse whether some distortion would be indicated by the offset doubling?  To satisfy my curiosity, I'll try an overlay later. |
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1295 Posts |
It's probable that the double nose penny is a hub tripled die rather than just a doubled die as the doubling cannot be explained by one offset strike of the hubbing die. That one is nicely toned but the coin surfaces are 'orange peeled' and hide the 'tripling' a little. This one doesn't have as much eye appeal but the lack of toning makes it a clearer example of the variety.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
Mark, nice shot! I now see what you mean-- the doubling in GRATIA has one displacement, while in DEI there's both similar doubling,
but I see a third doubling beginning with the D, which continues anti-clockwise through ELIZABETH II. Any clashing on the coin?
Edited by KurtS
10/29/2008 01:11 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1015 Posts |
Mark and KurtS great penny's mate very interesting,I wish I had started the error coins of years ago there really fascinating regards Harry
Edited by nuggethill
11/08/2008 12:19 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
Thanks Harry! |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 21 / Views: 5,725 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 10/27/2008 01:06 am
