| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 3,237 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4846 Posts |
If the photos arent hiding anything j can see this being as high as a 67, looks like it's probably dripping with luster, looks good!
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
179 Posts |
Quote: Adam_E Posted - Today :2M ago If the photos arent hiding anything j can see this being as high as a 67, looks like it's probably dripping with luster, looks good! Hello Adam: I can say without any hesitation that other coins that I've bought and/or have traded from this individual show better detail and luster than these pics show. The owner is a straight shooter and doesn't doctor up his photo's. In other words: Honest Individual!
Edited by villagekid 11/01/2020 03:20 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Lighting makes it difficult to see field details clearly. You guys go for it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2340 Posts |
MS65 but in a MS66 holder wouldn't surprise me. Look fwd to your in hand pics. Beautiful coin! smat
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
These look like honest photos. You can get a general feel of surfaces, but it is tough for me to gauge the extent and depth of any contact marks. Currently I'll say MS-65, possibly +/- w/ different pics.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
171 Posts |
MS-65. This looks a lot better than the one I have and it's MS-65.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18687 Posts |
81(S) are strong and bold. without better photos i'd say this one is AVG for the year. its hard to say if any of the luster is broken and due to the blurry pics i'd be guessing at eye appeal. it looks decent though. looks like a few abrasions and maybe some rub here and there on the obverse. the cheek looks pretty clean as well as the neck. I'm going to put this one in the MS65 bucket for now. I think it may make 66 but I'm not going there until you get it in hand and take some better pics.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
I am guessing MS-65 but could see it as a 64 with clearer pics. looks nice though
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
179 Posts |
Love all the comments and support from everyone. The coin was graded in an OGH MS-66 It will be arriving in a few days and I look forward having it in hand. Thanks Folks!  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
I believe it is better from PCGS grade than I initially thought from photos alone, why it's so hard to grade Morgan dollars and some other coins via a single static photo. You can't roll the cartwheel to see surfaces, and I'm not convinced the DL nuTilt thing is perfect yet either (see link if you don't know what nuTilt is yet). http://goccf.com/t/380989
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18687 Posts |
Quote:why it's so hard to grade Morgan dollars and some other coins via a single static photo. You can't roll the cartwheel to see surfaces, i agree westcoin. so many of these its really difficult to see if and where there is broken luster especially across the cheek area. I guess it is what it is and we do pretty good at assessing them regardless. maybe a couple coin angles would help if they were tilted slightly
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
Quote: I guess it is what it is and we do pretty good at assessing them regardless. Yep I think you and I agree more often than not on most coins over the past few years. Not too shabby of a record either, once I thought about going back and making a graph of how many I got right, missed by 1 point high or low, then decided nah, too much work after all these years, but I'd like to know anyways, it would be interesting, and if I could go back to day one, I'd keep track as I went.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5675 Posts |
@westcoin, it would be interesting to see how accurate someone's grading is using decent photos, and then compare with how accurate they are using that nuTilt app. I would bet that improves the accuracy of someone's grading (relative to PCGS).
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 3,237 |
Page 2 of 2
|