1983 Double Clipped (20%) Bronze Transition Lincoln Cent

I guess I'm the contrarian here, but I'm not convinced it's entirely PMD with the way the rim on the right side fades into the clip. The one on the left doesn't seem as promising. But the weight is bizarre... What does the clip on the right side look like from the edge?

It is still way too light to be bronze.

I agree with the OP's proposition that it would be a 20% clip if the clips are clips because (3.1-2.5)x100/3.1=19%, and therein lies the problem...

Divide the coin into fifths (20%). Now mentally lay those clipped pieces in each slice of that pie. Not close to equaling that slice, is it?

I realize that the coin will have a more variable weight distribution across it (higher mass per unit area at rims and in the middle with higher relief devices) than my model, but this picture is closer to representing a 20% clip. I crept in to the correct weight by gradually snipping off pieces.

I have a feeling that we may overestimate clip area on a coin the same way most of us would grossly overestimate blood loss by looking at what has splattered on the floor, or soaked into our pants leg.... Don't ask.

I am not sure if those are clips or not, but the metal core looks more like zinc than copper to me. I am firmly in the "zinc" camp unless the 2.5 gram weight is wildly inaccurate.

The color on the cut edge might be tarnish, a foreign substandard, or a pale shiny surface reflecting the colored light bouncing from a nearby colored surface. It looks paler than the copper surface, to me. It also has the grainy appearance of a broken off piece of zinc.

As far as weight... Allowing for tolerances in the weight of a zinc LMC (plus or minus 0.13 grams) plus the uncertainty of the measurement of a scale that only measures to the nearest 0.1 gram (something + or - on the order of the last decimal place is a good place to start in the absence of calibration data or specs) a measured value of 2.5 grams for a clipped zinc LMC seems to be within the range of what we could expect. That uncertainty would account for the 0.1 - 0.2 grams (by my experiment above) or so of material that is obviously missing. So, that can explain the OP's measured weight of a 2.5 gram for a clipped zinc cent without invoking a paint hypothesis or anything else, but it won't reach far enough to cover the bronze planchet hypothesis.

This amount of effort expended on this subject is probably overkill, but I'd rather do math, read about coins, and perform experiments than work on my taxes, so the rest of you are just going to suffer my ramblings.... Please forgive me.

with Bruce

These two clips are genuine. The clip on the right shows fadeout and taper of the design rim as it approaches the clip. As for the clip on the left, the I of LIBERTY and the U of UNITED show metal flow next to the clipped edge. The two clipped edges do not show the classic cut-and-tear texture of a curved (concave) clip, but this feature is variably expressed. The edge should appear copper-colored whether it's a zinc cent or a copper-alloy cent. Color, luster, and the possible presence of microscopic bumps on the obverse suggests this is a copper-plated zinc cent. The zinc stock may have been thicker than normal, with the missing mass coincidentally returning it to specification weight.

Move over Coop, ya got company -