| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,628 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1207 Posts |
I took the previous pictures earlier but I did have one more that may or may not help  I would expect to see more damage but what do I know
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Too small to be a rim bur. Possible struck through a piece of thin wire? Probably about as thick as dental floss. Looks like it is barbed a bit, the incuse areas in the trench. It would be a minor error.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
Seem to be a mirror strike. Look that the coin was strike after the first. For this year I do not thing happened to offen. Is clear that the curve was strike before the coin strike. Nice find.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1207 Posts |
Thanks coop and silviosi. The indentations kinda sold it for me. When I started collecting around 2018 I saved almost everything unless it looked like clear PMD. Looks like this was a good save
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4618 Posts |
I'm leaning towards the "Pressed Edge" theory above. It looks like the deepest point of damage is at the top of the arch, with the rim keeping the damage from the field area at K:9. This would seem to show the the second coin was slightly tilted when it was pressed into this coin. If it were struck through I would expect the channel to be a single line of even depth and width, not tapered to a point at each end of it's arch. Just my Two Cents worth.
ANA ID: 3203813 - CONECA ID: N-5637 Clean a coin that may be worth collecting? Please DON'T! When in doubt, leave it dirty!! 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1207 Posts |
Thanks Yokozuna and Coinfrog. That does make a lot of sense. Could be PMD. Thanks to all for comments and info
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Edited by coop 05/22/2021 12:23 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
97524 Posts |
Quote: It looks like the deepest point of damage is at the top of the arch, with the rim keeping the damage from the field area at K:9. That is what I think as well. I did a little experiment: 2 quarters, thin piece of wood, and a hammer on my concrete patio deck.  
Edited by Dearborn 05/22/2021 1:03 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Question: Was the opposite side showing a bending outwards from the hit on the obverse?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1207 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1207 Posts |
Interesting experiment Dearborn. If the coin you struck has an indentation as clean as this one you may have solved the issue
|
|
Moderator
 United States
97524 Posts |
I didn't look at that.. Let me go have a look
|
|
Moderator
 United States
97524 Posts |
Quote: Question: Was the opposite side showing a bending outwards from the hit on the obverse? Well coop, I see no bending on the reverse, but then I only had to give it a light rap with the hammer. I'll post up the reverse image of the same test coin. The design I chose is a bit busy (I didn't think of finding a better coin with a clear field. It is what it is. There is no bending. If you compare the top of the arc on the obv the the bottom of the arc on the rev. NEAR the rim where the Oklahoma word is you will note a normal flatness. as opposed to the gouge in the same spot on the obv.   Funny thing though, I picked a quarter that does not show any copper on the reeded edge.. It is A 'D' coin. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
97524 Posts |
Now, I did go through several quarters to get the desired effect. and looking back on them, There was a bending of the coin noticed on the reverse..
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,628 |
Page 2 of 2
|