| Author |
Replies: 19 / Views: 7,677 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5318 Posts |
Thanks...it's actually much nicer in hand too. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
830 Posts |
That is a terrific old Cartwheel! Looks great 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3499 Posts |
Very nice! Would you say that is a VF or an EF?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5318 Posts |
I was guessing a VF due to details on the shield, but I'm sort of unfamiliar with these coins.  It's actually better looking in hand because the lens picks up every blemish. Not bad for $6, eh? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3098 Posts |
Actually, is this the same size as the regular pre-decimal penny?
If so... then wow! I want one!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5318 Posts |
David, this is quite larger than the later predicimal penny series. It's 36mm and 28.35 grams, and is quite impressive in hand.
|
|
New Member
Canada
18 Posts |
I always want a huge coin like this. I guess people at that time must have a huge wallet/purse when going shopping
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1077 Posts |
Was it made that big so that the value of the metal content equaled the face value?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3499 Posts |
QuickSilver- actually these were only made for that one year since the bullion value was actually greater than the face value. They were made so large and heavy so that people would accept them rather than the small, silver pennies that had been circulating up until this point.
Edited by Archraz 02/06/2009 5:09 pm
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
335 Posts |
WpgLwr wrote: Question: These were only made the one year, right? Seems like every one I see is 1797. There were tuppences too, weren't there?
Yes there were the larger and heavier tuppences (2d) of 1797.
I think they struck these coins for a few years all bearing the date 1797. But don't quote me on that.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3499 Posts |
Brissyboy- yes there were large 1d and 2d coins of this type dated 1797. These were actually made for a few years but all had the date of 1797.
|
|
Valued Member
Ireland
215 Posts |
In 1797, during the reign of George III, the Cartwheel Twopence piece was struck by Matthew Boulton at the Soho Mint.
This is by far the largest base metal coin issued in the UK, weighing two ounces (56.7 g) and measuring 41 mm diameter and 5 mm thick. On the obverse is a portrait of George III facing right, with the inscription GEORGIUS III D G REX, while the reverse shows Britannia seated facing left, holding an olive branch and trident, with BRITANNIA above and 1797 below. The weight means that the coin is very susceptable to edge knocks. The coin was found to be too heavy for regular use, and no more copper or bronze twopence coins were struck until decimalisation in 1971.
There are many late strikes made by Matthew Boulton in a variety of metals, and further ones made by W.J.Taylor when he bought the dies in 1848. I believe that the chief way these later issues can be distinguished is by marks resulting from die corrosion. He also produced a pattern or patterns dated 1805 with a different design.
REF T. CLAYTON
|
|
New Member
United Kingdom
10 Posts |
The cartwheel pennies and twopences did continue for a few years using the single impression from Matthew Boulton's steam press at the Soho Mint in Birmingham.
The coins weight was significant.. The penny weighed 1 ounce and the twopence 2 ounces. They were however not very popular because of their bulk.
They were produced at this weight to try and overcome the counterfeiting that was rife at the time. A fairly common find with the metal detector but usually in poor condition, not surprisingly.
Clive
|
|
New Member
United States
1 Posts |
You should see the....<<Staff snip>>
<< No, You should see how quick the staff here sees right through your extremely feeble attempt to spam this forum >>
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 7,677 |
Page 2 of 2
|