| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 2,336 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15445 Posts |
Store it any way that suits your collection. That mint wrap is not adding any significant protection value, so no loss in removing it. Nice looking example from what I can see from the obverse photo.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
635 Posts |
It is your collection. Do what you feel is appropriate.
|
|
Moderator
United States
188770 Posts |
I agree.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2271 Posts |
Get it out of that packaging. If you don't it will get worse and become permanently damaged.
Just soak it in 91% alcohol or acetone for a few days, rinse, gently pat dry. Then get it in proper packaging. The government packaging is no good.
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
292 Posts |
I removed that 1970-S small date LMC from the mint packaging and soaked it for a couple of hours in acetone. (It was kind of hazy.) It cleaned up pretty well I think. Of course, what is revealed is some light scratches and dings, perhaps some die polishing marks, and the diagnostic weak strike of "LIBERTY". Average quality from an uncirculated mint set?  Edited by EDM
02/20/2022 3:44 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
292 Posts |
Thanks all. I've removed it from the mint package and will post new photos.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
No better than 63 from what I can see.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2271 Posts |
It's about 70%ile in strike but only 30%ile in being mark free.
But it's a nice specimen and an awful lot of these have already been ruined by the packaging.
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19165 Posts |
Yes, average quality from an uncirculated mint set--sadly.
|
|
Moderator
United States
188770 Posts |
Quote:
Thanks all. I've removed it from the mint package and will post new photos. I merged your topics to keep this in one place.  |
|
Moderator
United States
15445 Posts |
Good call - now store the coin in whatever folder/holder/flip you prefer.
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art |
|
Valued Member
United States
292 Posts |
The scratches on the obverse are superficial "hairline" scratches which look worse in the photo than in hand, and changing angle they virtually disappear. The reverse side has 2 dings which look like they came from contact with another coin or two, typical of business strike coins.
Edited by EDM
02/21/2022 08:42 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19960 Posts |
Nice looking small date, looks like acetone did wonders for it!
Lincoln Cent Lover!VERDI-CARE™ INVENTOR https://verdi.care/
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2271 Posts |
Quote:
Nice looking small date... I might have underrated it a bit in terms of cleanliness. It's definitely nicely made but it can be hard to tell from a photo how visible the marking is. Suffice to say these are often marked up worse than this one. It is certainly a nice specimen. Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,336 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 02/20/2022 09:12 am
