| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 2,662 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
96837 Posts |
Not sure if you got a good deal or not as you did not include your purchase price for this lot.
your 1932 (D-S?) quarter is a low mintage coin and depending on condition, could bring in a nice premium
Edited by Dearborn
05/13/2022 9:36 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
162 Posts |
It's a 32-d. You can see some luster in person.   |
|
Moderator
United States
96837 Posts |
odd toning on the 32, or is it corrosion or dirt on it? Silver tarnish is usually much blacker than what we see here. I wonder if it took an over night bath in acetone to remove some of the dirt or gunk. If you do use acetone - DO NOT USE nail polish remover, as it has impurities in it that can damage a coin. Use pure acetone you can get from the hardware store.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Yes, please tell us the price paid. MM on '32-D looks a bit suspicious.
Edited by Coinfrog
05/13/2022 10:33 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
162 Posts |
I paid about 25$ for everything in the pic. It was part of a larger lot though, this was just the best stuff.
|
|
Moderator
United States
15464 Posts |
If that is a genuine 1932-D Washington quarter then yes you did very well. The mintmark with that dark halo looks very suspicious as a possible added mm. Silver melt value for the 4 quarters is $15.30, add a bit more for the wheat and Buffalo and the lot (assuming the 32-D is not a genuine mm) is valued somewhere about $16. I recommend focusing on determining the authenticity of the supposed 1932-D quarter. Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
828 Posts |
I agree with others.
The 32D mint mark does look suspicious.
The 32 D and S quarters are often Counterfeited.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
 , makes you wonder why the MM is the only thing surrounded with that dark spot .  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1498 Posts |
Seems too good to be true on the 1932-D. Looks like the mintmark was added. Sending it to a TPG would clear up any confusion, but you might be out the grading fee if it turns out to be counterfeit. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19184 Posts |
That D does look rather odd.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
That's a crazy good price for these coins. Can't get any better than these junk silver finds!! Nice work, it never hurts to peek at those junk bins.
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
The D mintmark doesn't even seem to be the same color as the rest of the coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4085 Posts |
I feel like a LCS should know coins well enough to know that the 32-D is a valuable coin. The fact that this lot was priced so low tells me that they think it's probably not real.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
735 Posts |
I agree the 1932 D does look odd, The 1934 appears to have a D mintmark as well which is a decent coin in high grade & if the 1940 has a d mintmark its pretty decent. The Wheat cent is nice and appears to be a 1909. The buffalo is decent looking & the standing appears to be average. So I would say a solid pickup for $25. I've been collecting for a couple years... Favorite Coin's are Standing Liberty quarters, Working on my type set | Coffee, Corvettes, Coins & the CCF what could be better? |
|
Moderator
United States
189003 Posts |
Nice lot!  I hope that 32-D proves to be legitimate.  |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,662 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 05/13/2022 9:38 pm
