| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,055 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19249 Posts |
I'm in with MS64+. Like its look, True View and all.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Well it's not knocking my socks off . MS-63BN . 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18717 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4085 Posts |
Agree with coinfrog - not a fan of grading from Trueview
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19973 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1361 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7519 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3668 Posts |
With the new pics, I think I'm at 63BN.
Member of SPMC, FCCB, ANA and ANS. My U.S. Classic Commemorative Complete Set: https://www.NGCcoin.com/registry/co...sets/278741/My U.S. Fractional Note Set: https://notes.www.collectors-societ...eSetID=34188
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Yes, I'm dropping to 62BN, possibly 63.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18717 Posts |
I'm good with my original grade of MS63BN. huge difference between trueview and in hand on this one and the reason to grade the trueview and then drop it one grade
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Sometimes two. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36903 Posts |
I'll revise to MS-63BN. I can see why Frog doesn't like Trueview.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1479 Posts |
MS64 BN head nick shoulder nick and nick on E of CENT are the only negatives on this one...if one can even say that because imo its a nice looking Lincoln and has nice soothing tones. I wouldn't kick that one out the back door.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1361 Posts |
In hand it is far more glossy with solid satiny luster.
It graded ms64bn
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18717 Posts |
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,055 |
Page 2 of 2
|