| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,270 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
109 Posts |
All good questions. I need to get more answers. It's a long distance thing. The seller is a state away.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
There is no way to evaluate that collection from the photos you provided . Some better dates and mints are missing . From what I see there is no way I would pay $300 for it . 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4085 Posts |
Quote: Spence - haven't checked them all, but there are clearly coins in the '14D and '14-S slots, they're just slightly mispositioned. I think that might be coins from the following pages showing through.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3324 Posts |
My somewhat uninformed opinion is that $300 is a little too high for the set presented.
"Nummi rari mira sunt, si sumptus ferre potes." - Christophorus filius Scotiae
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
KenKat - if that's the case, then Houston I think we have a problem. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
@CAM: I saw so many like this for sell. In your case all BN, and very much circulate. Missing a lot of good ones. The 09-S you put was clean in acid and the acid made his finger print. Me I will stay away from. For 300 you can have better.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
This thread is getting confusing. Please simply advise if this set has any of these and show clear pics of each - '11-S, '14-D, '22-D, '22-no D, '24-D, '26-S, '31-S.
So far, price seems way too high.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
The 1909-S reverse looks to have a rim dent near E Pluribus, which could halve its value. As the only key date clearly present, I'd say $300 is too much. If the 1914-D is present and undamaged, then $300 is still high, just not as overpriced.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2281 Posts |
To keep it simple, I wouldn't buy this for $300.
You realize when you know how to think, it empowers you far beyond those who know only what to think.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
Edited by NumismaticsFTW 08/07/2022 12:02 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19949 Posts |
Hard to judge, seems some holes are empty with the coin on the next page showing through. LOL
That said, you have to assume all the coins are only G. It's a decent starter set, the 09S didn't look too bad. The price might be a little high but someone starting out could get a quick jump on the series in one, quick swoop.
Lincoln Cent Lover!VERDI-CARE INVENTOR https://verdi.care/
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
We are now in the year 2022, Finding wheat cents in change or even CRH'ing 1909-1939 is virtually fruitless . So yeah as BadThad says you can get a quick jump on the series if you buy a set that's mostly put together . $300 would be a lot for that set . Try to chew him or her down to a more realistic price . 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2955 Posts |
Yeah,  that 300 seems a tad too highly priced perhaps... That 09-S looks to be a VFish in grade which is nice (not too convinced that the rim dent would really affect the eye appeal) although details seem a tad weak on the obverse. Probably $250.00 or a little less would be nicer, but one would have to grade every Wheat cent individually and look at the average retail value all added up and go from there. I see several higher grade coins in there which is also nice. You could also have a few interesting varieties in this set; and some of those could add value. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3402 Posts |
Missing dates and condition...condition...condition. Thumbs down on $300.
KK
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Thanks, KenKat, I see that now. Guessing the set is worth much less than $300.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188513 Posts |
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,270 |
Page 2 of 2
|