| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 2,073 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
713 Posts |
Luckily, what is below AMERICA is not what is known as "carbon spots", just staining -- And if it was, I would recommend not sending it to a TPG [if that is your intent]. |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
I'm in the MS-63RB club . Not too shabby .  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18670 Posts |
 with all of them 63RB. an 09VDB needs to be at least 65RD to warrant grading costs |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19958 Posts |
63
Lincoln Cent Lover!VERDI-CARE™ INVENTOR https://verdi.care/
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5672 Posts |
Agree with MS-63. The amount of color can be hard to judge from photos, but it looks RB to me.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19165 Posts |
I'm at MS64. Very nice example. Pretty decent photography.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
797 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2334 Posts |
He came back 65RB smat  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19165 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19958 Posts |
Nice, congrats!
Lincoln Cent Lover!VERDI-CARE™ INVENTOR https://verdi.care/
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18670 Posts |
i can see the RB and everyone else did also. either the original photos are not accurate as everyone put this coin at 63. you had the coin in hand and also called 63 or 64.
the original photos are showing blotchy surfaces on both sides, spotting on the obv fields and the carbon spots under AMERICA. cant see this at 65 using the photos presented. at best a 64RB. I think PCGS blew it again.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'm sursprised as well, but congrats!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15445 Posts |
I'm a bit surprised, but congratulations. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8516 Posts |
Very nice !
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2334 Posts |
I think when I was looking at this one...I thought that it looked 65 but deducted because of the reverse spots? There are no major open field hits and the devices look unblemished...guess they looked past them or maybe they would have given him a 66 without the spots? Either way...I am ok with this grade. Here's a larger pic so you don't have to look up the cert number for the TV smat  |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,073 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 08/20/2022 12:54 pm
