Looking For A Bit Of Help With Examples For My "Smith" Effect Clipped Planchet Indicator

CoinHi
Your larger clip definitely has the effect.
Once a fake clip is shown the difference will be more obvious.
If this were faked by cutting with a jewelry saw for example, the inside high point of the rim would have continued around to the cut and shown a sharp interior point. The obverse example from your coin shows a slight narrowing and the reverse actually rounds around at the clip. Both examples show the lack of metal to fill the rim but in different ways. Like I said, not seeing the sharp interior rim point opens the path to it being a mint produced error.

Thanks Tunnioc !
http://goccf.com/t/249224

Thanks silviosi!
Posting all four intersection points is great as the effect isn't always obvious at all of the four points but lends confirming evidence of a incomplete planchet when found.

Here is a 1923 Buffalo that isn't a clip but because of the "Smith effect" can be proven to be a incomplete planchet. The coin is so worn from circulation that the corresponding weakness on the reverse could be discounted as wear.
The thin green line on the last photo showes the shape of the effect on this coin.

Excellent example !
Many Thanks!

RW1010
I'm not sure on this one . There are some unexpectedly hard lines on this one. There doesn't seem to be the smooth transition I would expect to see. Almost like a struck through. Have you posted this before ?
The line in the bottom of the recess closest to the R is throwing me off .

From this closeup it does have the hallmarks of a incomplete planchet including the edge effect. Nice !

From the photos I can't quite tell what's going on . The reeding on the edge appears to be there and the field at the edge of the anomaly seems normal.
Adversely there doesn't seem to be any buldges of displaced metal to indicate damage. Not sure about this one.
I normally use this edge effect for evidence to confirm the id of a anomaly. Here , I'm not sure of the anomaly