| Author |
Replies: 24 / Views: 1,564 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
I'm thinking fake as well. Maybe Mike needs to get in on this fun  John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Second strike goes in different directions on date and IGWT.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34410 Posts |
Quote: how is a coin double struck on one side only? Just spit-balling here, but I don't see how that is possible. So either the rev is double-struck, but so perfectly that there is not a single design element even slightly doubled or else a counterfeiter prepared a purposefully jenky obv die such as opined by @pete.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1527 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8751 Posts |
I agree with bringing Mike in.
-makecents-
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8751 Posts |
Throw me a bag or two of popcorn, GMS5. 
-makecents-
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2824 Posts |
I seen this before on another site different coin . I always like the counterfeit coins it was maybe coin talk. That one turned out it was two guys from the Bronx in the 1960's scamming collectors they altered a 1964 cent also same thing one side but rotated differently..
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15435 Posts |
I can't imagine any way this is authentic. Mr. Diamond opinion is not needed IMO.
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
|
|
Moderator
 United States
96214 Posts |
I think fake - the secondary (weaker) 'IN GOD' are not in the correct alignment. Plus the date is only slightly rotated CCW, while the Motto at the top has a much larger rotation.
Edited by Dearborn 11/03/2023 9:32 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6108 Posts |
It appears to be a soft die counterfeit. The rotation is CW on all elements but the focus of the rotation is not the center of the coin so it looks a little different from one side to the other. As noted above, there are a lot of these from 1964, but other dates are known have such strikes as well.
And a point of note. "Rotation" is the direction from the weak set of devices to the final strong set because on a real coin the weak part was struck/hubbed first, then rotated to the second position and made the strong bit.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
 That's what it looks like, soft dies.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1780 Posts |
...very interesting ... seems it would have been a lot of effort to produce this fake ... does anyone crying "fake" have a good explanation as to how this was achieved? ...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1034 Posts |
TB: "And a point of note. "Rotation" is the direction from the weak set of devices to the final strong set because on a real coin the weak part was struck/hubbed first, then rotated to the second position and made the strong bit." This was helpful information to me and explained perfectly. Thanks
Edited by kurdlezuit 11/04/2023 2:10 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2737 Posts |
This is a fake "one-sided" double strike. The obverse was struck by a counterfeit die of relatively soft consistency. The soft, blended overlap between the primary (genuine) design elements and the secondary (fake) design elements is characteristic of such crude counterfeits.
Error coin writer and researcher.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1502 Posts |
Hmmm I took some measurements based on the photo and the distance between specific points on the doubles reduces from left to right. And given how the date doubles NE - it had to have been a different die (and a smaller one at that) that hit the first strike. Has to be a fake.
Examples: - Top Right G - 68 pixel spread - Bottom left D - 64 pixel spread - Bottom Left W - 57 pixel spread - Bottom Left S - 39 Pixel spread
Edited by DOCC 11/05/2023 11:50 pm
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 24 / Views: 1,564 |
Page 2 of 2
|