| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 2,000 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Not my field, but a beautful example!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73844 Posts |
I'll say AU.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
402 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
851 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1081 Posts |
I can't tell what the surfaces look like so I'm reluctant to go full-on AU. Certainly the details are there for it but it might be EF-45 if there's no lustre.
PCGS tends go high on circulated Canadian coins but they also prize eye-appeal which is a little on the low side for that guy.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5585 Posts |
I'd go no higher than AU, because there is visible wear on the crown. There is also environmental damge and a ding on the rim.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
107 Posts |
Everyone was fairly close. I was largely surprised by the straight grade considering the reverse and was leaning towards XF Details. Big Reveal:  |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1527 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1081 Posts |
Interesting - did they send you one of their fancy PCGS photos? That might illustrate their rationale.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5585 Posts |
With that grade and no comments, I guess that it was worth having it cert'd, since it's now a 4 digit value. Good job
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36678 Posts |
AU-50 seems right but the environmental damage should have given it a details grade.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2495 Posts |
Nice coin!!
Solid ICCS EF-45.
PCGS has improved on MS Canadian coin grading, but still drop the ball when grading circulated Canadian coins.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
107 Posts |
I should also note that I included PCGS's restoration service for the coin. My "before" pics are poor but I think it is improved although they appeared disinclined to go after the reverse more aggressively.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
9862 Posts |
Very little wear on this one.
Au 50 is appropriate.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
|
|
Valued Member
United States
107 Posts |
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,000 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 11/29/2023 11:25 pm
