| Author |
 Replies: 21 / Views: 2,387 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2023 Posts |
Chances of 1815 are slim to none. As much as I see the 5, I don't see a 25 or 35 from these pics. So I'm going with 1816 as well.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10601 Posts |
Quote:
Chances of 1815 are slim to none. I'd go with "none" as no Large Cents were ever struck with the 1815 date on them. I agree with 1816 - |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10601 Posts |
Comparing the 1816 to the 1818.........   |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2213 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10601 Posts |
Quote:
I vote 1815. No Large Cents were ever struck with the 1815 date on them  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74809 Posts |
I'll say 1816.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12477 Posts |
Has to be 1816.
In Memory of Crazyb0 12-26-1951 to 7-27-2020
In Memory of Tootallious 3-31-1964 to 4-15-2020
In Memory of T-BOP 10-12-1949 to 1-19-2024
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3474 Posts |
Quote:
No Large Cents were ever struck with the 1815 date on them Sadly, that doesn't mean 1815 dated large cents don't exist. We see coins that were never produced by the US mint on this site far too often. I'm not suggesting the OPs coin is fake, only that 1815 large cents could exist. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1467 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
104 Posts |
Pigeonman333rd : (I don't know how to insert quote so...)
" I like it because it looks antiquish and could have been held by some of the people who founded America. "
I was passed down a couple of Colonial Era coins which are in poor condition and I feel the same way about them. It's amazing to think of their journey.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10601 Posts |
Quote:
only that 1815 large cents could exist. The Holy Grail brought to us by Daniel Carr........  Or you can always make your own........   Edited by Marv65
09/27/2024 1:31 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6610 Posts |
From PCGS Quote:
No large cents were struck in 1815 due to a fire at the Mint, this being the only year in which One cent pieces (of any size) were not made. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
I think you should attribute it by die variety, confirming the date. As it sits, it appears to be an altered 1816. Quote:
No large cents were struck in 1815 due to a fire at the Mint, this being the only year in which One cent pieces (of any size) were not made. The fire burned in January 1816, meaning it was not the primary reason why 1815 cents were never struck. The war of 1812, lasting until 1815, put immense pressures on coin production and the availability of precious metals to make coins with. People were hoarding metals that would otherwise be usually coined at the mint. Copper planchets were being sourced from England (note how corroded classic heads come), but no planchets were able to arrive in the U.S. since an embargo was enacted between the combating nations. It was a slow year, seen in the lack of 1815-dated issues across all denominations except low mintages of quarters, half dollars, and half eagles. Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1280 Posts |
I don't think it's an 1816. Numbers are too close together
|
|
New Member
United States
5 Posts |
I see a 6.   Edited by coinonaut
11/18/2024 10:20 pm
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,387 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 09/26/2024 5:06 pm
