| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 3,143 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Germany
992 Posts |
Quote:
I wonder if this would be the first time a new series was printed with signatures of a Treasury Secretary and Treasurer with neither of them in office at the time? No. For example: Mnuchin (Secretary) / Carranza (Treasurer) signature notes were printed long after they had left office. Edited by redlock
06/29/2025 12:37 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1374 Posts |
Yes, but the series was started and first printed while they were in office. It's not that unusual for a series to continue to be printed for a while after the Secretary and Treasurer have left office.
I'm wondering if this is the first time a series is first printed with the names of folks who are no longer in office.
Edited by BadDog
06/29/2025 1:09 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
952 Posts |
Absolutely no reason they can't sign and get the ball rolling already on 2025 notes. IDK why they always seem to see this as an afterthought.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1374 Posts |
When I was checking to see if any BEP production reports past Apr 2025 are available (there currently aren't any), I took another look at the BEP's Mar 2025 production report. I'm not 100% convinced that any 2021 series $2 star notes were printed  The report says J* $2 notes were printed BUT it also says that the series letter for the notes was "Q". Unless things have changed, $1 and $2 FRNs don't have a series letter, so a "Q" series letter is not consistent with past practice. It could be there is a typo in the denomination column and $2 isn't correct. Maybe these were in fact $5 QJ* notes. Guess we'll just have to wait until more BEP reports are available to verify series 2021 $2 FRNs have been printed  |
|
New Member
United States
19 Posts |
QJ 000 00001 * for $5 was already printed October 2023
QJ 032 00000 *
QJ 032 00001 * in March 2025 could be $5 not $2 i.e. a typo
QJ 064 00000 *
QJ 000 00001 * in March 2025 could not be $5 though: that would collide
QJ 005 00000 *
Time will tell...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1374 Posts |
Quote:
...could not be $5 though: that would collide RIght you are. I didn't check to see if any $5 QJ* notes had been printed when I said maybe these could be $5s. Can't be 10s or 100s either as those have been printed. They could be 20s. Twenties would be an easy typo. Leave off the 0 and $20 becomes $2. Plus, it looks like the series 2021 $20 FRNs began printing in Jan 25. Having the first * notes printed in March seems consistent with this start of printing |
|
New Member
United States
19 Posts |
I sent a request for clarification to the BEP. Let's see if they respond...
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187862 Posts |
Quote:
I sent a request for clarification to the BEP. Let's see if they respond... |
|
New Member
United States
19 Posts |
It's getting better. And by that I mean it's getting worse. Over on another forum someone got the May-to-August reports. And in the August report those exact $2 notes show up once again... March 2025  August 2025  |
|
New Member
United States
19 Posts |
I filed an electronic FOIA request with the BEP, to get to the bottom of this, i.e. a review and correction of their 2025 reports, and a return to the decade old practice of linking the monthly reports on their public website in a timely fashion. Stay tuned...
|
|
Valued Member
United States
116 Posts |
Looks like these notes were printed in the new fifty notes per sheet format. Were the 2017- A $2's printed in this format also?
|
|
New Member
United States
19 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1374 Posts |
Quote:
Over on another forum someone got the May-to-August reports. ...and did they say how they got these reports since they aren't on the BEP's website and that Aug table is a little different in that it now has a "type" column with "N/A" indicated. Wonder what's that all about Edited by BadDog
09/23/2025 2:40 pm
|
|
New Member
United States
19 Posts |
Quote:
...and did they say how they got these reports since they aren't on the BEP's website
With a FOIA request. Quote:
and that Aug table is a little different in that it now has a "type" column with "N/A" indicated. Wonder what's that all about
Plus swapped rows. Edited by lautlos
09/23/2025 3:01 pm
|
|
New Member
United States
19 Posts |
An update.
My BEP FOIA request was unsuccessful.
"The BEP FOIA program does not correct error elsewhere."
At this point it's probably gonna take a request to the office of the director...
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 3,143 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 06/29/2025 1:09 pm
***
