| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 1,215 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19144 Posts |
I suspect they're not cleaned. Looking rather good!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10504 Posts |
Looks like AU examples. Straight grades.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7618 Posts |
They both look uncleaned to me. I think they have that R&B 63/64 look and are nice examples. I wouldn't be ashamed if they were mine!
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
78 Posts |
Thanks, all! and now I have some examples to compare other coins to in the future :D
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73944 Posts |
They're fine. They haven't been cleaned.  Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1654 Posts |
Both nice examples in collectable condition.
|
|
Moderator
United States
15408 Posts |
I don't see any obvious issues with them. Nice looking cents.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1745 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36724 Posts |
They looks original to me.
|
|
Moderator
United States
188102 Posts |
Quote:
now I have some examples to compare other coins to in the future :D |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19942 Posts |
These both look great, nice coins, NOT cleaned or altered.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1259 Posts |
Actually, they are both very nice looking wheat cents. Thanks for sharing them with us.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1094 Posts |
Love the wood grain look on lincolns.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
577 Posts |
Looks both AU and not cleaned, perhaps AU-58 for the 1909 and AU-50 for the 1928. I can't tell if there's wear on the 09. Honestly the 09 could be an MS60/61 BN.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
78 Posts |
Thanks for the help, everyone!
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,215 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 12/08/2025 6:12 pm
