| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 675 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2860 Posts |
As far as I can tell, the Cud looks legit to me, though.... the pic is quite small. Any chance of a reverse pic? |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74639 Posts |
Looks real to me. Nice Cud!  Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189222 Posts |
I agree, looks like a nice example! |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21628 Posts |
Quote:
It is Fake! PCI can not be trusted,I think... they make the grades way higher than they should be, like that penny, its VF not MS! Quote:And they can't tell the difference between a PMD coin and a error coin... heritage auctions said that. Rocky, please stop making statements like this until you learn more about coins. You are making statements about counterfeits and grades on coins when you don't as of yet have the knowledge. Every coin you have listed thinking it is an error has just been damage and you are nowhere close to be able to grade coins. As far as this 1944 cent with a Cud, it looks genuine to me. Here is a photo of another similar but different year Cud.  Edited by JimmyD
02/26/2026 1:00 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7516 Posts |
It looks to be genuine. can you post a little better picture from both front and back?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
109 Posts |
sorry, just trying to help. I will study more!  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21628 Posts |
Quote:
sorry, just trying to help We appreciate you trying to help but it is no help when you post misinformation. You are not at the stage yet where you can diagnose your own coins let alone others. As mentioned on one of your previous posts, study the minting process, read up on what an actual error is, learn the difference between an error and a variety. It is not something you are going to learn overnight. |
|
Valued Member
United States
109 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
109 Posts |
Wait, how do you quote people?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3662 Posts |
This looks legit. I've seen many overgraded PCI coins, but -- so far -- no counterfeits in PCI slabs. I played with the image exposure and warmth a bit, and was able to get a decent look at the surface and details. If this is a counterfeit, they did something I've never seen on a 1940s Lincoln counterfeit: they got the 4s in the date correct. Both of the very different fours, in this case. I don't see any listed 1944-D obverse Cuds or pre-cuds. There is one listed reverse Cud. This could be a new listing, and a nice one. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4038 Posts |
Like this: Quote:
Wait, how do you quote people? Copy and paste what you want to quote, then add the word quote within brackets [ ] ahead of it, and the word quote within brackets with a slash [/ ] after it. Edited by rmpsrpms
02/26/2026 2:49 pm
|
|
Forum Dad
United States
24171 Posts |
You don't need the whole word as of a couple years ago just a q.
[q]Quoted Text[/q]
|
|
Moderator
United States
97087 Posts |
Quote:
Wait, how do you quote people? like this: typing: [quote]this is quoted[/quote]Becomes: Quote:
This is quoted Or more easily done as Bobby has shown |
|
Valued Member
United States
109 Posts |
OK!
Edited by Rocky B
02/26/2026 5:00 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2738 Posts |
The Cud looks genuine. The reverse should show a featureless pucker. Error coin writer and researcher.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 675 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 02/26/2026 12:17 pm
