| Author |
Replies: 32 / Views: 882 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
745 Posts |
One thing I have noticed is that Gold Eagle and Gold Coin pricing is generally spot plus a small premium
Unlike Silver Eagles where you can pay exorbitant premiums over spot based on their numismatic value
You will never find a 1995 W for 10% over spot or for even 100% over spot
But it seems I can always find the Gold Coins and AGEs I want for 5-10% more than spot
I attribute this to a far smaller collector base,
I'm not sure if I'm right but it seems there are more people willing to pay $3000 for 1995 W Silver Eagle then those able to pay $25k for the 2020 v75 Gold Eagle
Edited by Boba Debt 05/10/2026 12:15 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188052 Posts |
Quote: I expanded this collection to include the 2016 centennial coins Looking good! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
745 Posts |
I received my 2006 set that I bought from APMEX this morning With the discounts and $613 cash back I ended up paying a little over $14700 I was on a notification list for the set and I bought it within 5 minutes of receiving the notice Apparently it was the only set they had at the time I was kind of worried because it shipped from "The Return Center" but once I saw that the OGP hadn't even been opened I felt better I still took them to the local shop to confirm that they're authentic, Here's some pics of the set transferred to the 20th Anniversary Silver Set OGP which is what I intend to use for my Gold Coins and Eagle Type Set I'll post some better pics of the coins later  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1218 Posts |
Came with some sort of a pamphlet from the mint as well?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188052 Posts |
Looking good! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
745 Posts |
Quote: Gilly wrote
Came with some sort of a pamphlet from the mint as well? I'm pretty sure I received all of the OGP - outer sleeve, inner box, the case and there was the COA that you can see in the lid of the case in the above picture Am I missing something? Quote: Jbuck wrote
Looking good! If I'm being honest I think the Silver Eagles look way better than the Gold Eagles The proof is similar but the reverse proof does not pop as much as it's Silver Eagle counterpart 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1218 Posts |
Sorry, this was with just my 2 coin silver and gold set, not my gold set  Moderator, note the site turned this sideways, again
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188052 Posts |
Quote: Moderator, note the site turned this sideways, again Are you uploading from a phone or your computer?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1218 Posts |
Quote: Are you uploading from a phone or your computer? My phone. I just take pictures with my phone, so easier to transfer to the site that way. When I had to reduce the image size, it was also easier to access the app I used with the phone.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188052 Posts |
I suspected. Phones are tricky. The like to save the files as Landscape, but store the orientation in their local database. I would have thought your edits would have fixed it, but I guess phones are just going to be a pain.  If the orientation data is not saved in the image, the forum is not going to be able to guess. Best way to avoid is always take landscape photos. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1218 Posts |
Quote: I would have thought your edits would have fixed it, but I guess phones are just going to be a pain. I didn't edit that particular picture. I know it's larger than allowed. You know better than me that something changed and we can now upload larger images, so I just tried uploading without decreasing the file size to under 300kb. So just now I downsized the image to under 300kb. Let's try it:  NOTE TO MODERATOR I did nothing to the post where I first showed that picture, yet it's orientation is now correct
Edited by Gilly 05/14/2026 11:39 am
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188052 Posts |
Ah! Looks like the edit worked! Editing usually updates/saves the meta data so the forum optimizer knows how to orient the photo.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188052 Posts |
Quote: I did nothing to the post where I first showed that picture, yet it's orientation is now correct You used the same file name, so it overwrote what you uploaded earlier. That is why we strongly suggest using unique and informative names. It helps you to search so your uploads can use it again. You can rename them in the fly... 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1218 Posts |
So the ultimate answer is to reduce the file size or risk having the orientation wrong~OR~be sure to photograph in landscape.
Edited by Gilly 05/14/2026 11:47 am
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188052 Posts |
There is a chance the smaller file size—which causes the forum to skip the automatic optimization process—does help. The automatic optimization process was fixed to read the meta data, so if it is there it should use it and therefore I do not think you need to reduce the size. You just need to make sure your editor saves the orientation data in the image file. Camera apps apparently do not. But if whatever app you are using to edit the photo is going to reduce the size anyway, so be it.  For what it is worth, every single photo I imported from my old point-and-shoot camera to Google Photos shows as landscape, even though a good number of them were taken portrait. The raw image file from the Kodak has no meta data. Just a raw and huge JPEG file. I had to re-orient them in Google photos. 
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 32 / Views: 882 |
Page 3 of 3
|