| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 3,692 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
79 Posts |
I agree that one should buy the coin, not the holder, but the issue here is the grade given to a variety of coins by those paid to give third party opinion of the grade. If you read the fine print provided by each grading company you will find that there is no "standard", that they go by or guarantee their grade to be, other than by the definition that each company uses. Here again, there is NO standard. So, your coins meet the standard of grade by each company, that does not mean they were graded improperly, they were just graded by that companies guidelines of which some or more liberal than others. Personally, I stick to PCGS. They have tight standards, coins in their holders generally bring a premium and at this point, I trust them.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
436 Posts |
These were all really nice grades to beginn with, and it looks like a bunch got downgraded...why exactly did you do this in the first place? Not only did it cost you a bunch of money to submit them, but you immediately lost worth for those who buy for investment only (not me, but losing value is losing value). I just don't understand... 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
79 Posts |
hippiebrian, if you were a collector as serious as a heart attack about his collection or investment, you might say that they are now properly graded. It is all in what you are looking for. I prefer PCGS graded coins, I will buy NGC graded coins, but at a discount. It is hard to find some coins, like foreign in PCGS holders, so you may not have a choice. If I were collecting say Morgan dollars or Lincoln cents, I would make a choice of which grading company I preferred and try to stick to coins graded by them only.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
365 Posts |
Extremely interesting experiment, as well as an interesting array of interpretations drawn from it. How come the 2 NGC and 1 IGC didn't cross? Do they give an explanation for such instances?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
436 Posts |
Although I am a serious hobbiest (don't know what the definition of serious as a heart attack collector is), I buy the coin and not the slab. I buy to complete sets, and if something catches my eye, which may be why I don't understand why the need to re-slab. Overall, NGC is accepted about as as PGCS, Therefore, say, an NGC MS-66 would be worth less than a PGCS MS-65 in most cases, which seems like a big risk just to have matching slabs.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5626 Posts |
Great topic, I believe there are people who will collect, and then there are people who will only collect certain"things. I would use the example above for a point to be made, I do not believe people are doing this, taking good money and good graded coins and are praying for the "new" grader to upgrade the coin, in this case PCGS, I believe if you hit a home run( get your wish for the better upgrade), you will now have a "slabbed coin" worth more money? I can in theory see what is trying to be done, only there is another side of this equation, 1st your money spent is totally a blind turkey shoot, you obviously have money to "gamble" with for what, the chance you might get some coin(s) back with the almighty PCGS label, and spend a small fortune in doing so, thats if you receive an up-grade. I also believe people who look for slabbed coins, are looking to "assure" them selves of a more positive return in the future, if you knew coins and are familiar with grading, why bother to get them slabbed at all, because if you state you are doing ALL this to possibly receive a deep cameo or PL MS70 coin, you can save your money and collect the thousands of coins out there that are "raw", just as nice if not nicer than the filthy rich TPG'S coins, they also love to have people like this to give them business and money .They have created a market on the corner, and most just shop there because of the name? I myself have a few slabbed coins because I loved the coin. I will never sell or look to cash in on the coins I love to hold and see and touch( with gloves ), you see I am as serious as any-one else here or else where about my collection, the major difference is, I am not looking to cash in some day, not that this is a bad idea, just do not think keeping the TPG'S in the millions of dollars every year is the way to go, invest your heart out, only IMHO, you are not only spending your money you could put towards your future bottom line, you are following the path of many who feel they would never buy a coin unless it is slabbed by this company or that one. Like most things, there is a time and a place for everything, I for a very long time, could not understand why people do this, now, I know there are many reasons, of which I feel are a total waste of money. It's not like we are talking about the Eliasberg Label on a 1895-S Morgan silver dollar in MS68!!! Again, just my opinion
|
|
Valued Member
United States
429 Posts |
I think what the problem is that we all collect differently and that there is no right or wrong way to do it. I do not collect slabbed coins, but I do have some. The coins that I have bought have some type of eye appeal that I could not find some where else and are not key dates or expensive coins. There are a number of people that do like to have a slabbed set and have them all graded by the same company and have them all in a certain grade, so why are we getting upset what an individual wants to do with his own set? If I had to choose a grading company 99% of the time I would go with PCGS and that is because their standards seem to a bit higher than everyone else. The times I have compared slabbed coins next to each other it has been obvious that there was more time spent on the process (even though they do not tell you how). The sad thing is to pick up a slab, tilt it to the side, and see a reflection from a scratch or nick on the coin and that the company has graded it MS70. I do have to agree that it is sad that there is no set standard from company to company, because if there was then we would not be having this debate at all. Not that long ago I was in a coin shop and looking at their half priced shelf and noticed they had the 2009S State Quarters there graded by PCGS as MS69 and selling for $10 a piece. So I looked at the dealer and said "they must have wanted a perfect coin and got mad when it wasn't". He laughed and said it happens all the time, someone comes in and thinks they have the perfect coin and get upset when they don't receive it. He then went on to say that with their experience that the same coin could go to one of the other grading companies and would come back with the MS70 that he wanted. He also went on to tell me where he had a coin that he thought was higher than the grade given and sent in a total of 5 different times, received 5 different grades and finally quit when the fifth grade was the highest given. To me, the grading companies are like the label on your car, is it a KIA or a Lexus? To some people this really matters and to some it does not matter at all. Personally, I would rather just own the coin, but would never complain about owning a highly graded slab. My big question is when is it enough? I can see having my Lincoln Wheat's graded and slabbed, but a new 2009D? Why pay $20-50 for a $5 coin, now that does not make any sense to me.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
206 Posts |
This post was only done as an informational first hand report of TPG From posts and readers I find that it sparked a lot of interest and well thought reply's. These where not expensive coins Roosevelt, however there where mostly key dates. No explanation was given for why the three coins did not cross two where proofs. One a 1951-s ms 67ft. On observation the bottom band was mush. Draw your on conclusions from this post, these are the results.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
one thing I would like to ask is, were these coins cracked out then sent in or were they sent in with the slabs intact? If I ever send in a coin that I think may upgrade (or even the same grade) I usually crack it out so they don't know what the other TPG graded it, that way they can't just bump it down one grade and say we are stricter than they are cause we graded it lower than they did
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
206 Posts |
sent it in old holder as per there request, ( first time sending cross graded coins) for cross grade interesting take on cracking first. how do you do on raw cracked coins ?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
well I usually wouldn't bother unless I thought it was either undergraded or I just wanted all my coins in the same slab, but I have had pretty good success with some of the coins atleast coming back the same grade and some were upgrades but most were the same grade. I have had some knocked down a point and even have had some that I cracked out of PCGS rattlers get body bagged but it is just a game of cat and mouse. I have always heard if you don't like the grade you get the first time crack it out and send it back in until you get the grade you want
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5626 Posts |
Yes, the old, Cat, Mouse, and Money Game!!
While I would not even think to suggest or tell some one what or how to collect, I just do not see the reasoning of this practice except to have all your slabbed coins from the same company, and in the process, making the grading companies very wealthy....
If you have the money to hope and pray for an upgrade, there must be something else I am missing, I should buy stock in these companies, they do very well!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1599 Posts |
Interesting topic. Being fairly new into this and definetely not capable of grading coins, I have been relying on the slabs to get the quality of coin I want. I am reading and trying to learn to grade myself. This thread brings several concerns, particularly the one about submitting the same coin several times and not getting the same results. I have limited my purchases to PCGS and NGC. I have looked at several ICG and ANACS and they do not look to comparable to PCGS. Anyway, this discussio has further confused me; if I cannot rely on the thg and can't grade myself, what to do!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
79 Posts |
jprine, I have a similar problem, although I took the ANA grading seminar, I have coke bottle lenses. So, I rely on grading companies and prefer PCGS. IMHO, the most important thing to understand in this conversation, is that there is no UNIFORM grading standard used by these companies. They all have their own and in the fine print you will find reference to that. They grade to THEIR standards, so is is not difficult to understand there is a difference in grades from different companies. From experience, I would suggest if you are submitting a graded coin to another company, you remove it from the holder, prior to submission.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1055 Posts |
Quote: Jprine: I have looked at several ICG and ANACS and they do not look to comparable to PCGS. ANACS and ICG are considered good solid grading companies. (3rd and 4th in line behind PCGS and NGC) With ANACS a bit above ICG. ANACS was the original TPG. I have found great deals from buying coins in ICG or ANACS slabs that have been overlooked by the PCGS or NGC purist. Some nice slider coins go for considerably less money at auction in an ANACS slab vs. PCGS. If I ever go to sell I may send in my ANACS, ICG slabbed coins into PCGS to get the sellers premium found when selling PCGS coins.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 21 / Views: 3,692 |
Page 2 of 2
|
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

- 2026 Circulation Coins
- 1987-D Quarter / Die Trails
- Coin Die Design For The 21-St Century: Did The 2026-P Dime Break A 100-Year Mint Rule?
- Bullseye Toned 1935 Buffalo Nickel, Possible DDO-001.
- Commems Collection Classic: 1936 Norfolk, VA Bicentennial/Tricentennial - Hoffecker?
- 415-405 BC Silver Tetradrachms Of Syracuse, NGC XF Strike 4, Surface 3
- 1958 40 Francs Pattern From French Equatorial Africa, PCGS SP-62, Lee-23, A. Galtie
- 1966 And 1971 Possible Dime Errors?
- 1919 Buffalo Nickel . Wrong Planchette
- Quintillus Antoninianus
- Commems Collection Canadian: 1997 John Cabot Voyage 500th Anniversary
- Is This 1924 Quarter XF Or AU And How Much Is It Worth
- How Much Is This 1837 Greek 10 Lepta Coin Worth
- 1951 S Lincoln Wheat Back Penny With Dual Sided Planchet Error
- 1973 D Penny Liberty Letter Different Sizes?
- Buffalo/Indian Head 1 Gram .999 Silver Round Coins
- 2015 Quarter ? Error?
- Video ANA Academy: Error Coins 101
- 1884 Nickel Pattern, J-1724, PCGS PR-68+DCAM, Simpson Collection
- 1869 Shield Nickel. Reverse Of 67
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use
|
| Coin Community Forum |
© 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums |
| It took 0.38 seconds to rattle this change. |
 |
|