| Author |
 Replies: 25 / Views: 9,500 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
212 Posts |
A 1988-Denver RDV-006 was on ebay a couple of weeks ago. It was in a PCGS slab with the variety not being noted on the slab. The seller figured the coin to sell for $1,000.00. The coin was sold for a little over $400.00. Because the variety was not noted on the slab,the buyer returned it! The seller was very happy to have it back again.I think the buyer made a HUGE mistake returning the 88D. Edited by JoeyZ76
08/17/2010 06:48 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1409 Posts |
Great - another year to start pulling as I roll search. I'll put them in piles and go through them at the end of the box. I love this forum, as everyone is so helpful with photos, explanations, etc.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
613 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4000 Posts |
I have only found one '88P, and that was in a small stash that one of my friends from work brought in for me to see if he had "anything good". Can you believe it? Of all the boxes I have searched, I find one in his, roughly, $10 change jar.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
142 Posts |
A lot of good info and photos in this thread, I have one good reference photo I can share too... I am of the thought that with Wexler identifying 6 dies for both the '88P and '88D with reverse of '89 that they will be either as common as or more common than the '99 WAM. They may not have seen full die runs but I'll bet enough were minted that once word spreads and searchers multiply more and more will appear. The '88P has already dropped in value. An '88D being worth $1000 (if someone would pay that!) will be fleeting at best.  |
|
Valued Member
United States
182 Posts |
One more time for me: RDV 005 is supposed to be on 1988. If it is RDV 006 and on a 1989, it is the sought after 1988-D. That makes the normal 1989 the G with the Hook and tail, right? So what, then, if the 1989 has the reverse of the 1988 and it is missing the hook and tail? Som descriptions say this is due to polishing and die abrasion, and the die markers are the die gouges around the G in the designer's initials. I have scads of 1989 P cents, and just this one cent has a different reverse.
If the G has that hook thing, then it is a 1989 reverse? But I have a 1989 that looks to be the normal 1988. Odd thing. If I have time tonight, I will take pics and let you decide which reverse of the few shown is the 1989. Otherwise it'll wait till tomorrow.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4000 Posts |
Every '89 example I have seen with what appears to be an '88 reverse has turned out to be over-abraded dies. The polishing is heavy around the initials and just happened to have filed away the hook things.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
182 Posts |
Thanks Scooby, I see filing on my example, too. That's gotta be it. My 1989s have the regular or the polished away features. Will get a better loop now. Mt glasses don't help anymore.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
129 Posts |
So the die varieties are on both the 88P and 88D?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3592 Posts |
yes pocket change, there are 88 P & D with the RDV-006, D is the rarest of the two
|
|
Valued Member
United States
129 Posts |
Cool! I was just checking the '88P. Thanks.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1164 Posts |
Thanks for the better info...if only I read this before searching yesterday...I didn't bother with the 88-D. Did run past a few 88P and D in $65.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3592 Posts |
Pocketcahnge & Hoosier, you can skip the D's until I find one  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1164 Posts |
If I findone first...I'll split it with ya!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1164 Posts |
I thought I found a nice one today. A very nice looking 88D. When I flipped it over I couldn't see the FG. I put it aside until I was done with my searches today. I had to crack out the higher loupe. Then I could see a faint outline of both the F and the G. Got me going, though. I didn't notice any signs of wear on the reverse. Just the initials were missing...at first.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 25 / Views: 9,500 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 08/22/2010 07:59 am
