| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 6,167 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1733 Posts |
I saw that pic in your previous post, thanks boxox. As I said I already know I don't have a brass penny but I'm betting that if I were to turn it to vapour I would find it's not the exact component values put out in the guides. There's been a lot of deviation and a lot more lead show up than I expected (even though they almost always tossed in some back then). Oh to be a fly on the wall at Heaton and Sons.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
287 Posts |
Nice coins, even if the one is yellow. LOL. Certainly makes it different. :)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1353 Posts |
Ugly - I used to think there was a lot of variation even in bronze cents. Then I had two bronze cents spectro'd. Both were 95/4/1. One had a minor (<<1%) of lead.
http://www.victoriancent.com2011 & 2025 Fred Bowman Literary Award Winner, 2020 J. Douglas Ferguson Award Winner, & 2022 Paul Fiocca Award Winner. Life Member of RCNA.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1733 Posts |
That is very interesting Bosox. There's no decent published study on this that I could find. I need a sample of 100 units to even give enough of an indication that it's even worth investigating further. I've seen higher lead concentrations though, certainly more than trace picked up from moving down the channels during founding. There is some minor sampling of other Heaton planchets and we know they kept lead stock around and that it was a cheap filler.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1248 Posts |
Bosox, how did the TPG determine that it is brass? Just by color?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1353 Posts |
The dealer (who I know and respect) who submitted it told me it was submitted with a spectro result of 85% copper. I suspect PCGS did their own spectro verification, but don't know for sure since I did not submit it.
http://www.victoriancent.com2011 & 2025 Fred Bowman Literary Award Winner, 2020 J. Douglas Ferguson Award Winner, & 2022 Paul Fiocca Award Winner. Life Member of RCNA.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1248 Posts |
Sure would love to see the analysis results, and how they did it. I know from German east Africa 20 Heller coins that it is nearly impossible to determine which metal it is UNLESS you remove samples and have these analyzed. Or use chemical agents to remove all surface patina nd other properties on the surface to get to base metal. In Germany they use a small scratch somewhere on the side of the rim to obtain material for analysis. This is normally done by a certified and court appointed Coin appraiser. he will 5then certify one way or another and indicating the analysis in his report.It is to be noted the coin is NOT sealed when given back, Only described.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1733 Posts |
Spectrographic analysis is a blanket term that usually involves destructive testing. The advances in spectrographic analysis have all surrounded the quantity of material needed being decreased, the available reagents becoming more targeted to the likely alloy etc... Even rapid high tech machinery simply vapourises a sample with a laser in a chamber with inert gas so that it can be analyzed.
The point I suppose is you can't just look at an alloy and figure out what it is, somewhere down the line whether you use X-ray, infrared or visible light etc you need a small destructed sample.
This is all high tech of course, there are still old fashioned methods that involve basic chemistry you can do in primitive lab conditions, much like portable assay kits used in gold scrap dealing etc...
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
Sample destruction is not necessary if you utilize the proper testing equipment  XRF spectroscopy will give you a nondestructive elemental analysis but it would not be cost-effective for a low value coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1733 Posts |
@biokemist16 Does that wink mean you have an XGT 5000 at home that you rent? :p Yeah I know there are other devices, I'm sticking to things I've typically found in QA labs but like everything once you retire - your knowledge base can drift out of date rapidly. Mine has. Point of fact thought, I don't see a TPG needing this to identify a brass coin. The colour really is a dead giveaway.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1353 Posts |
The tests I had done on the two bronze coins were done with some form of XRF at a testing company here in San Diego. Totally non-destructive. Cost about $45 per sample.
That brings up another point. Many cleaned coins take on the yellow color of brass. Just about impossible some times to tell the difference. The two I had tested consisted of one yellow one I thought might be brass and one bronze for a control coin. As stated previously, both came out 95/4/1.
http://www.victoriancent.com2011 & 2025 Fred Bowman Literary Award Winner, 2020 J. Douglas Ferguson Award Winner, & 2022 Paul Fiocca Award Winner. Life Member of RCNA.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
Nope, I do not have access to an XRF but BadThad does use one is his line of work. Thanks for listing you cost bosox, I figured $50-100 but that was only a best guess on my part.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1733 Posts |
Well this discussion has definitely added to available resources. I guess I should not be shocked by the drop in prices on these technologies, it's been that with all tech so why not this.
Thanks gents.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1353 Posts |
When I did the tests, I posted about it on another site. Here are the more precise results that I posted:
Coin #1 - 1859 cent in Very Fine - weighes 4.31 grams - 94.37% copper, 1.13% zinc, 4.50% tin.
Coin #2 - 1859 cent in Almost Uncirculated - weighs 4.36 grams - 94.91% copper, 0.72% zinc, 0.17% lead, 4.20% tin.
Obviously the composition of both coins is quite close to the nominal 95% copper, 4% tin, and 1% zinc specified for the issue. The melting room at Heaton got it right on these two. Given the weights of the coins, the rolling mill operator did not. He rolled the bars too thin.
http://www.victoriancent.com2011 & 2025 Fred Bowman Literary Award Winner, 2020 J. Douglas Ferguson Award Winner, & 2022 Paul Fiocca Award Winner. Life Member of RCNA.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1733 Posts |
From my POV that's a substantial deviation for only two samples. By the mid 19th century metallurgy was actually a science, weights and measures were actually accurate. Machines and machining on the other hand... well, some were better than others.
Some of this can be accounted by the fact that they made all kinds of planchets and were responsible for a great many alloys. Just common reuse of smelting equipment will account for some differences. A short measure of tin after an extra long tea break might account for others.
I admit to curiousity.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 21 / Views: 6,167 |
Page 2 of 2
|