| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 3,066 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
321 Posts |
I agree, a little weakness in strike but I still lean toward 65
|
|
Valued Member
United States
462 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
380 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3234 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2448 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
285 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
14454 Posts |
I updated the pictures , I took these outside instead of inside. Maybe it will help with the darkness of the pictures
|
|
Valued Member
United States
321 Posts |
With new pictures I say solid 64
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
5375 Posts |
65-66 maybe on second though. I see no marks indicating anything below 65 and the strike is full.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
321 Posts |
 mmmmhhmmmmmmmm I was right! awesome coin Bryan1315, thanks for sharing. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
yeah you guys did really well at grading these. as I said in the other thread I believe a few of these coins are either a lock for a upgrade or at least very PQ for their designated grades. I am hoping to at least get a plus or Pl out of a couple of these when I send them back in
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I just received another VAM-81 today as well in a MS-64 NGC slab. I also have another MS-64 VAM-82 and MS-65 VAM-83 on their way. When the other coins get here I will send them in for attribution so I can get my Collectors Society registry set back in the #1 slot |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
5375 Posts |
I'm honestly surprised at the 64, usually TPG's were more liberal with these, right? I remember going into the shop when I was 17 and seeing some 64's and thinking....really? |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 3,066 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 09/28/2010 09:52 am
