Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Questions About Proofs

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
First Page  Showing last 15 replies.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 3,690Next Topic Page 2 of 2
Valued Member
United States
79 Posts
 Posted 04/27/2011  12:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add HalfDollarDave to your friends list
Also, there are business strikes from San Francisco for the 1976 Bicentennial set. I also believe that they have made some business strike cents since 1968, but I don't know for which years.
Pillar of the Community
United States
659 Posts
 Posted 04/29/2011  10:22 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add penny man to your friends list
san fransisco made business strikes for cents 1968 through 1974 and nickels 1968 through 1970.
Valued Member
United States
355 Posts
 Posted 05/05/2011  9:38 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add phankins11 to your friends list
SO here's where I'm getting confused....I see a lot of pre 68 quarters that are labeled on ebay as P proofs. Did the P mint produce proofs prior to 68? Are these proofs? If so how do you tell a difference between these proofs and a BU example of a pre 68 business strike coin from the P mint.

Here is an example search

http://shop.ebay.com/i.html?_from=R...l-Categories
Pillar of the Community
United States
1817 Posts
 Posted 05/05/2011  10:21 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Bizybackson to your friends list
All proofs prior to 1965 were made in Philadelphia and carry no mintmark. There was no proofs issued in 1965-67, but Special Mint sets (SMS). Starting in 1968, San Francisco makes all of the proofs found in the annual sets, both clad and silver from 1992 onwards. Of the P-mint proofs that you are discussing, they occur in two distinct periods, 1936-1942 and 1950-1964. They are easily distinguished from a Philadelphia business strike by having squared off rims, a sharply defined strike, and if untoned white, deeply mirrored fields AND devices. This is true of all years except for '36, some proof coins received a satin finish instead of a brilliant proof finish. Only the first few dozen coins of a new die would issue proofs with frosted devices, but generally proofs of this era are of the brilliant uncameoed variety.

And in the case of the quarters, the business strikes had reverse A throughout, while the proofs had reverse B from 1937, with slight differences of detail between each. Reverse B was used for some Philadelphia business strike quarters 1956-64, but they are generally scarce and hard to find, and make for a nice subset. When found uncirculated, they have the finish of a brilliant proof, but are either poorly struck or lack the detail of true proofs.
Edited by Bizybackson
05/05/2011 10:31 pm
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts
 Posted 05/05/2011  10:30 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add biokemist6 to your friends list
Other than a few incredibly rare branch mint proofs, Philadelphia minted all proof coins prior to 1964(no proofs minted at all 1965-67). Currently, the Mint strives to mint DCAM proofs but that was not the case back then. The modern Mint uses grit blasters and diamond paste polishing to give the dies that appearance. The old method of die prep involved chemical pickling followed by a polishing. The first few strikes from fresh dies could produce DCAM and CAM coins but the frosted areas would quickly wear away which resulted in the majority of proofs having a brilliant finish. Older cameo proofs are highly sought after and can be quite valuable.

The primary indicators of a pre-1965 proof would be brilliant mirror-like surfaces, extremely strong details, and sharp squared rims.
Valued Member
United States
355 Posts
 Posted 05/06/2011  08:29 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add phankins11 to your friends list
Bizybackson and biokemist6 - thanks for the info and as usual it has created more questions for me. What is meant by reverse A and reverse B. And Another question is if 36 was the beginning of the first proof period for quarters does that mean that from 1932-1935 there were no proofs made, which collection wise means I would only be searching for (in my case) circulated and BU examples from all mints?

I can tell for sure this is gonna be fun, all this detail about 1 little coin...who knew?!
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts
 Posted 05/06/2011  10:33 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add biokemist6 to your friends list
No proofs were minted at all between 1917 and 1935. They were minted again from 1936-1942 with an extended pause for WWII and then production resumed again in 1950. You probably do not want to worry about the 1936-42 proofs right now, mintages were between 4k and 22k so they can be quite pricy.

The B reverse for Washington quarters was the normal reverse for silver Washington proofs while the A reverse was the normal silver business strike reverse. From 1956-1964, some of the B reverse dies were used for business strikes- the B rev is found exclusively on Philly quarters. The primary pickup point(PUP) is the ES of STATES- the letters are connected on the A reverse and there is separation between them on the B reverse. The reverse hub design was changed again in 1965 which created the C reverse. Some 1964Ds will also have the C reverse, PUP is a central line through each tail feather.

Pillar of the Community
United States
6383 Posts
 Posted 05/06/2011  1:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jaobler to your friends list
The proof situation is surprisingly complicated. Just when you think you have a handle on it there is an exception!
Quote:
All proofs prior to 1965 were made in Philadelphia and carry no mintmark.

The 1942 Jefferson nickel proofs were made in normal copper-nickel alloy and the copper-silver-manganese wartime alloy. The wartime alloy proof carries a large P mintmark above the dome of Monticello on the reverse.

One other oddball coin exists: the 1984 Olympic commemorative $10 gold piece. These were issued in proof format with P, S, W, and D (Denver) mintmarks. I added one of these to my collection, just because of the oddity of a Denver proof coin. I think there were some unofficial proofs made when the Denver mint opened in 1906. The $10 Olympic coin is otherwise the only Denver proof available to collectors.
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts
 Posted 05/06/2011  1:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add biokemist6 to your friends list
D'oh! I completely forgot about the 1942 proof silver, thinking there was only the standard alloy. I intentionally disregarded commemoratives and bullion since their mintmarks tend to be much more random than proofs for circulating designs.
Valued Member
United States
355 Posts
 Posted 05/06/2011  1:32 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add phankins11 to your friends list
I knew there'd be a reason I'd love this hobby. This info is absolutely fascinating to me. So one more question (my grandpa used to call me the 20 question kid hehe), if I were to ever find myself in the position of trying to determine if a reverse B from the 56-64 range is a proof or a business strike, is the only tell tail sign the deep mirror finish and the sharp details on the rim and devices? It seems to me on a BU example that may be hard to do.

Love the info guys...keep it comin. If you had to give me 1 or two book suggestions on the Washington quarters, what would they be?
Pillar of the Community
United States
6383 Posts
 Posted 05/06/2011  2:20 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jaobler to your friends list
Phankins11, that is an excellent question and the answer is, you sometimes can't. A BU coin should have a satiny, brilliant luster in the fields while a proof should be more mirror-like. There is however a range of surface qualities for BU and Proof and there seems to be some overlap. I see many 1956-1964 silver quarters at coin shows that are labeled BU which I think are actually proofs.
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts
 Posted 05/06/2011  2:48 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add biokemist6 to your friends list
I would recommend The Official Red Book: A Guide Book of Washington and State Quarters by Q. David Bowers
Valued Member
United States
355 Posts
 Posted 05/06/2011  3:10 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add phankins11 to your friends list
Jaobler - sounds like I need to get out to some coin shows and get me some of those BU "proofs" - hehe. Thanks for the answer. As I got to thinking about that question struck me. biokemist6 I will look around tonight and see if I can't pick that book up. Does it cover the details like the different reverse dies used ans such? I assume it probably covers things like errors as well. Again guys this has been a lot of fun just learning this stuff.
Valued Member
United States
355 Posts
 Posted 05/06/2011  4:32 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add phankins11 to your friends list
Just ordered The Official Red Book: A Guide Book of Washington and State Quarters by Q. David Bowers for 11 bucks..not a bad deal! Cant way to get it and start reading...now what can I toss questions out here about now....maybe I'll start a topic on my collection and just keep updating it as I add to it. Either way I've learned a lot just from this question alone, very valuable tool here.
Valued Member
United States
355 Posts
 Posted 05/06/2011  9:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add phankins11 to your friends list
I just checked a 61 P that I bought a while back (one of the ones that got me started) IT was advertised as a GEM BU that was from a mint set, however it has the B reverse. So I either have one of the business strikes with a B reverse or I have a Proof that was though to be just an uncirculated. Now in comparing this 61 p to a known 64 proof the only difference I see is that Washington's portrait in the proof does not carry the mirror finish that this 61 does so I'm inclined to think what I have is a 61 P Business strike that was struck with the B reverse die.
Page 2 of 2   Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 3,690Next Topic Page 2 of 2
First Page  Showing last 15 replies.
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.37 seconds to rattle this change. Forums