| Author |
 Replies: 173 / Views: 16,322 |
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
287 Posts |
I had a list of 14 possibilities because I could not see a way to exclude 89 -xx - 98. Cna somone tell me how they excluded those ?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Mexico
1304 Posts |
Yes, I'll send you a PM ;)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1358 Posts |
98 was one of those numbers eliminated in one of the two major "no click" groups..
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
287 Posts |
Thank you harrison2, I have replied.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Mexico
1304 Posts |
Sorry rikcando, not seeing it. (Not in my spam folder either)
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
287 Posts |
Sorry, I simply replied and it sent it here. Basically what I said was....
There was 2 postings that had 98 in the third position on that page.
nod2003 posted 30-12-98
and
you posted 89-89-98
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
287 Posts |
Quote:
coinsearcher:
98 was one of those numbers eliminated in one of the two major "no click" groups..
Could you please elaborate on this. I cannot find where 98 would have been eliminated. Page# maybe? thanks in advance. |
|
Valued Member
Canada
287 Posts |
For the record, I am just trying to find where I went wrong. I'm trying to understand how I could have missed it so that I don't repeat the same mistake if the dog ever goes on vacation again, and the safe is accessible.
I'm not trying to take anything away from the game, it was great. I am not trying to take anything away from harrison2 on his win. Well played and executed. I am not bringing down the clues that were given, I think they were well placed and informative, yet still elusive enough to make it all interesting.
Just trying to find my mistake. They don't happen very often so I like to see them when they happen. Kinda like Haley's Comet. {edit: but more often.}
Edited by rikcando
07/04/2011 3:39 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4000 Posts |
Not sure where he ruled out the 98 from, but you could have used this clue: Quote:
There have been some very close encounters, but none of the third kind. to rule out 98 for the third column. Up to that point, 68 had yet to be called. Which is why I threw out "pick an unused number" clue. Edited by Scooby Due
07/04/2011 4:35 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Mexico
1304 Posts |
Agreed, that last clue was the key.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1358 Posts |
Yup, my bad.. I was thinking 89 that was ruled out as the third number, not 98..
*d'oh!*
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Mexico
1304 Posts |
Yeah, that nearly got me a couple of times too...tricky Mr. Scooby!
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
287 Posts |
"third kind"
Doh! Okay, I totally have it now. thanks.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3179 Posts |
Great game Scooby! Now I see how subtle the clues are! Congrats to harrison2  |
|
Pillar of the Community
Mexico
1304 Posts |
Why's that? I am now premanently:  Hehehehhee.... |
|
|
Replies: 173 / Views: 16,322 |
|
First Page
Previous Page
Posted 07/04/2011 12:03 pm
