| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,688 |
|
|
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
 United States
12252 Posts |
Though the Modern Series of US commemoratives is now in just its 31st year, it has produced 113 gold, gold/platinum, silver and clad design types. This is in comparison to the 59 gold and silver design types of the 63 year run for the Classic Series. So, in essentially half the time, the Modern Series has issued roughly twice the number of designs! Just as with the Classic Series, the Modern Series had its period of "abuse" when an inordinately large number of commemorative coins were issued. For the Classic Series, the period of abuse ran from 1934 through 1936 -- 24 of the 48 types of commemorative half-dollars were issued during this period. For the Modern Series, the peak period began in 1991 (five different designs) and ran through 1996 (11 different types). Over this six-year period, the Mint struck 49 different gold, silver and clad design types -- 43% of the total number of modern types in just 19% of the modern period timeframe. Thankfully, Congress stepped in each time and enforced limits on new commemorative issues. Here's a quick look at the type breakdowns: Classic Series (1892-1954)Silver- Quarters: 1
- Half-Dollars: 48
- Dollars: 1
Gold - $1.00: 6
- $2.50: 2
- $50.00: 1
Modern Series (1982-present)Copper-Nickel Clad Silver - Half-Dollars: 2
- Dollars: 65
Gold Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21786 Posts |
I was thinking that for the $50 Half Union, there are two types: the octagonal and the round.
I have had BOTH types sitting in the palm of my hand at a Noble Spinks auction view day in Sydney, many years ago. Together almost four ounces of gold.
|
|
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
  United States
12252 Posts |
As the two coins share essentially the same design and differ only in shape, they represent two varieties of the same type.
It is certainly a thrill to hold these large gold coins in one's hands. I've done it a couple of times at large coin shows, but my biggest thrill came a few years back when I had the chance to hold both while in a secure area within the Smithsonian Institution!
Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Edited by commems 07/11/2012 8:46 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
I cant for the life of me think of which 2 modern halfs are the silver ones. Drawing a complete blank.
Any idea why they decided to change those from silver to clad anyway?
|
|
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
  United States
12252 Posts |
@basebal21: The 1982 Washington and 1993 James Madison/Bill of Rights half-dollars are the two modern silver coins.
As to why silver was used for these two issues...
Being the first commemorative coin of the moderns series, it was natural for the Washington coin to be silver in the tradition of the all-silver classic series of 1892-1954. The JM/BoR being struck in silver is a bit more perplexing.
The JM/BoR coins had an interesting legislative history. There were multiple bills introduced for these coins between the 101st and 102nd Congresses. The specifications for the coins varied between each of the proposed bills. In some, only a silver dollar was specified. In others, a gold half-eagle and silver dollar were requested. In still others, three coins were specified -- gold half-eagle, silver dollar and half-dollar. Here too the bills varied, some of the three-coin bills called for a copper-nickel clad half-dollar while others called for a silver half-dollar. In the end, Public Law 102-181 specified that a silver James Madison/Bill of Rights half-dollar was to be struck.
This silver specification was a bit of a surprise, as by the time the 1993 JM/BoR coins were approved, the Mint had already released several copper-nickel half-dollar commemoratives -- 1986 Statue Of Liberty, 1989 Congress Bicentennial, 1991 Mount Rushmore, 1992 Olympics and 1992 Columbus Quincentenary. It appeared as if clad was the metal of choice for the half-dollar -- it matched the circulating coin. As the Mint went back to clad after the JM/BoR issue and has continued to use the clad composition to the present day, it appears that the JM/BoR silver half-dollar was a one-time anomaly.
Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Commems great info as always. Very interesting how many bills circulated around for the JM/BOR one. Personally I wish they would have kept all the halfs as silver like the older ones we all have grown to love.
I cant help but wonder if the half dollars now being clad is part of the reason why they seem to be struggling with popularity now. The Army Half barely sold at all and I want to say it was $15-20. Seems steep considering you can get the quarter proof sets cheaper
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187582 Posts |
Thanks again for another informative post. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
561 Posts |
commems
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3453 Posts |
Quote: my biggest thrill came a few years back when I had the chance to hold both while in a secure area within the Smithsonian Institution!    Great post! What was really cool for me is I was able to remember without looking up what the classic quarter and dollar were plus the $50 gold. Before your input, I would have been looking those up! Now one day, if only I could actually OWN them. 
|
|
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
  United States
12252 Posts |
@CoinsKelly: Great to hear! I'm looking forward to the day when I can "pass the educational baton" to you. Then I can sit back and enjoy learning from your posts!
Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3453 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15386 Posts |
Short reply ... too much work ... well done again commems.  David
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
593 Posts |
Very interesting! It was right around that same timeframe (1991-1995) that the Bureau of Engraving and Printing went NUTS with commemorative stamps. It was so bad as to be a detriment to the hobby of collecting. They were trying to maximize profits from collectors but killing the hobby in the process!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
620 Posts |
Thanks and a tip of the hat to Mr. Commems. I learn something every time I read one of your posts or comments. So thank you for taking the time to share what you have learned about this great and historical commem series.
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,688 |
|