| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,206 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
980 Posts |
I am aware that NTC may grade significantly more loosely than say PCGS. However, can one trust that say this coin: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...ME:B:SS:US:1is genuine? Are TPGs generally reliable at spotting fakes/alterations? If one bought this coin, and it did turn out to be altered, would NTC financially guarantee the coin? Thanks in advance- no I'm not buying a CLT coin anytime soon, but eventually... Don
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2884 Posts |
Hello! Try going to this link... http://rg.ancients.info/guide/slabs.html and I believe you will enjoy a very comprehensive rating of the main TPG's. Let us know what you think. Most of the big guys PCGS,NGC,ICG,ANACS and PCI are good at authentifcation. Mike  I bought an NTC slabber a few weekas ago($5.00 1841 Gold Piece}. NTC graded at AU58. I broke it out and sent it to ANACS and should get a FAX by Monday with their opinion. I'll let you know!
Edited by Mike 03/10/2005 3:13 pm
|
|
Forum Mom
 United States
5877 Posts |
Personally, I would stick with PCGS, NGC, ICG, or ANACS. PCI has also been considered fine for authentication, but not recommended for grading. I've seen too many inconsistencies with NTC grading to be comfortable with their authentication. JMHO
|
|
Valued Member
United States
307 Posts |
I have only seen a few NTC slabs and my dad owns one...they seem to be ok...I think the slab my dad got is pretty near the right grade too.
So I would say 9-10 that NTC is alright.
Speedy
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
980 Posts |
Thanks all Mike, please do let us know. How would you grade it? where did you purchase it? Any pics? Why are you submitting it to ANACs now? The link you provided is most useful summary of TPGs I've seen.
And to follow up-if one purchased a pcgs slabbed coin which one could demonstrate wasn't genuine, my understanding is pcgs would reimburse the owner. I couldn't find any such guarantee on the NTC site, nor is it mentioned on that ancients link Mike provided. Don
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2724 Posts |
Until collectors have the ability to grade and authenticate for themselves, they should stay with the top 4 companies only. NGC, PCGS, ICG, ANACS. PCI can be used for authentication only. They are pretty much off by two points on grading. ALL other services really should be avoided until the above mentioned skills are honed.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2884 Posts |
 Don, I don't want to cause a firestorm of controversy by admitting I bought a slabbed AU58 coin from a "lower tier" service when quite frankly I only thought the coin was a Solid AU50. By controversy I mean many people boycott buying"overgraded" coins slabbed by some TPG's in hopes of running them out of business and would accuse me of being greedy at the cost of others being ripped off. The coin was actively bid for on e-Bay and sold at a very fair price for what I hope will come back an AU50. If it comes back a XF45 I'm O.K. from a buy standpoint. My main reasons for buying it were appearance, it fit a hole in my type set, price and admittedly hoping a top(or higher up the food chain)grading service would call it a AU50.I use ANACS when I think there is a chance PCGS or NGC might send a coin back in a "body bag". I also like the fact that ANACS will slab problem coins with clear explanations and assign it a market grade as well as the technical grade. I personally think ANACS is very tough on cleaned coins, even those just lightly cleaned. I have played around with crossovers and found ANACS to be more conservative in grading then most folks would have you believe. I think PCGS AND NGC would slab a lightly cleaned coin and just lower the grade with no explanation. I have gotten less variation on ANACS to ANACS re-submittals than I have with PCGS or NGC. My favorite example is a PCGS slabbed AU58 Type two $1.00 Gold Piece. It looked like an Unc.to me so I popped it out and sent it back to PCGS. Well to my delight it came back an MS62!!! That is an $850.00 coin jumping to a $5K coin. In another batch that I sent in was a stunning MS62 1853 Type one $1.00 gold piece. I thought I had a 63 maybe a 64 nailed. Well it came back an AU58!!! Go figure. The point that bothers me the most as were talking Circ. grades vs. Unc. Grades, one area where the pros should not have much trouble. If you want to see the coin (I don’t have it back yet) go to http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...=3960297056. I’ll respond further after you take a look and tell me what you think. Thanks, Mike
|
|
Forum Mom
 United States
5877 Posts |
I personally find gold difficult to grade and the pictures are not as large as I would like, so I'm not going to guess at the grade.
I do not see a problem with collectors buying the lower-tier graded coins as long as they are able to throw the slab grades out the window and rely on their own judgement. I know many collectors who have found really great deals that way, as most collectors pay considerably less for lower-tier slabs. Please post better pictures when you receive it than the ones in the auction. I am very curious to see this coin.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2884 Posts |
Susan, the pictures were not that great but I've held the coin in my gloved hands. It looks very sweet to me. I pulled out the 10X Loupe and it did not appear to be cleaned. There was quite a lot of lustre in the protected areas and it had a very nice over all color. I think putting these coins in reputable holders does a service to the collecting community in the long run as they re-enter the martketplace. So you won't even take a shot at the grade based on those pics? What did you think of the buy price? What did you think of the sellers guarantee? Mike P.S This coin is a Breen 6351, rare in all grades(15,833 minted) A small hoard of UNC's turned up in 1953. Another reason I went after it.
Edited by Mike 03/10/2005 11:53 pm
|
|
Forum Mom
 United States
5877 Posts |
I still won't hazard a guess at the grade based on what I see in the pictures. From what you're describing, I think you got a nice AU coin. I'm still very hesitant to trust my grading skills with gold. I tend to undergrade it because I'm unfamiliar with which coins have soft strikes to start with. Always more to learn. With his return policy and the fact that you've seen the coin, I would say that you got a very good deal - Way to go! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
980 Posts |
quote: Originally posted by Susanlynn9
I still won't hazard a guess at the grade based on what I see in the pictures. From what you're describing, I think you got a nice AU coin. I'm still very hesitant to trust my grading skills with gold. I tend to undergrade it because I'm unfamiliar with which coins have soft strikes to start with. Always more to learn.
With his return policy and the fact that you've seen the coin, I would say that you got a very good deal - Way to go! 
what she said. Seriously, although it's tough to tell from the small photos, this newby can't see significant wear. You looked at it with a loupe- I bet you are correct about it being au. At the absolute worst, you have an ANACS slabbed XF coin with good eye appeal that you like and bought at a fair price, and I'm betting that you did much better, and got a good, perhaps even excellent, deal on which you can make a profit if you choose.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2884 Posts |
How's the Forum doing tonight? I'm resurrecting this post because I got a FAX today from ANACS with the grades from my last submission. The coin we discussed in this instance was an 1841 $5.00 gold piece that was slabbed AU58 by a no name (NNC) TPG. The coin came back AU details, Net grade EF45, cleaned! I was hoping it was an AU50 and definitely did not think it was cleaned. I called ANACS and was able to catch the Coins there before they shipped out and asked if they could take another look at that coin and also a few others. They called me back a couple hours later and said they were sticking to the grades they assigned. They did agree to put some "sticky notes" on the ones I questioned with specific details of where to look on the coins to see where the "problems" were. I'm anxious to see what they have to say. By the way the coin is now just an average if not a little bit expensive deal. Mike 
|
|
Forum Mom
 United States
5877 Posts |
Sorry to hear that, Mike. It's nice that they're going to include notes, though. Consider that the extra money went for the learning experience. Many end up paying way over the value of the coin for lessons like this, so consider yourself lucky 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
980 Posts |
Hi Mike, Sorry you didn't get a higher grade. I know it's disappointing- but you did describe it as "sweet" so it must have eye appeal. We forget, uless you're selling site unseen, that's the important thing. Aren't most gold coins of that vintage cleaned at some point? As for me, if I were looking for this coin, I'd rather have one with "AU details" that is marked down a bit for prior cleaning if that cleaning wasn't visible to me- I bid on one slabbed that way on ebay last month. Don
|
|
Valued Member
United States
307 Posts |
I have some coins at ANACS and I think one might come back cleaned--if it does it was only diped in Acetone. I should have asked for them to fax with the grades but I didn't...I wonder if I called them if they would tell..
Speedy
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2884 Posts |
Speedy, they will FAX you the day they ship for $3.00 if you ask. There must have been some hang-up grading my coins because they were late and the Final Grader sent two back for re-evalution before I even called. Unless you buy a top TPG slabbed coin, my experience tells me that ANACS sends back at least half of old Silver, Gold and Copper as being Cleaned! I think some of the "Big Three" TPGS ignore light cleaning and just lower the grade a bit. My biggest disapointment in this batch was a Beautiful 1853 $1.00 gold piece that was slabbed PCGS AU58.I would have have bet the farm it was at least a MS61/62. Well the Folks at ANACS graded it AU55 details, net EF 45 'Edges Filed" I should have left it in the PCGS slab and requested a minimal grade I would accept.(how did that get by PCGS?)The rest were a mixed bag and the one winner was a no problem VF25 1805 Half Cent.It was raw when I bought it and was graded a problem free strong VF by the seller.If you call ask for Paul, he seems to be on top of things. Mike  Just for the record, if you look at one of my earlier posts in this thread I mention an 1853 $1.00 gold that went PCGS MS62 to PCGS AU58,if you read what happened above the slide downward on this coin continues!!!! 
Edited by Mike 03/17/2005 01:57 am
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,206 |