Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Shop CCF Members on eBay! Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Commems Collection Classic: What If? 1917 6-Cent Coins For Circulation

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 528Next Topic  
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12252 Posts
 Posted 01/12/2026  12:44 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Last year, I posted about an unsuccessful 1918 proposal for a 15-cent coin (see: What If? 1918 15-Cent Coins For Circulation. This time out, I thought I'd travel back to 1917 for another odd-ball coin denomination proposal.

In August 1917, George Holden Tinkham (R-MA) introduced a bill that would have authorized the US Mint to produce 6-cent coins for circulation. Upon its introduction, the bill was referred to the House Committee on Coinage, Weights, and Measures.

ICYWW: Six cents in 1917 was worth the equivalent ~$1.50 (per CoinNews US Inflation Calculator).

The bill was very "open" in terms of its coin specifications, it did not include requirements for the coin's weight, composition, size or designs. All coin specifications were to be determined by the Director of the Mint, with review and approval by the Secretary of the Treasury .

The bill did not outline reasons for its proposal, nor did Representative Tinkham outline reasons while introducing the bill. The fact that the bill did not specify a metallic composition strongly suggests that its introduction was not prompted by pressure from the silver, nickel and/or copper industries - either directly or via their lobbyists.

The issue date for the coin also went unspecified in the bill, other than "as soon as practicable." Considering the bill's date of introduction (August), it is plausible to think that the coin would first have appeared in 1918 vs. the Mint rushing to achieve a 1917 release.

While it may have made a small percentage of regular purchases slightly more convenient, there did not appear to be an overwhelming commercial need for the new denomination (e.g., it was not needed to simplify the purchase of a US postage stamp - which was either two or Three Cents in 1917 - as was the case for the three-cent coin of 1851). As a result, it wasn't much of a surprise when the bill failed to be reported out of Committee or acted upon further - it quietly faded away!


For other of my posts about coins and medals (and even a bit of paper currency),, see: Commems Collection



Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187582 Posts
 Posted 01/12/2026  12:50 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
An interesting proposal. I feel like Tinkham was bored or testing his colleagues' attention.

Thank you for sharing.
Moderator
Learn More...
nickelsearcher's Avatar
United States
15386 Posts
 Posted 01/12/2026  1:49 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsearcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Reads to me as a completely oddball proposal for a denomination that was not needed.


Quote:
I feel like Tinkham was bored or testing his colleagues' attention.


Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
94728 Posts
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12252 Posts
 Posted 01/13/2026  5:51 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Reads to me as a completely oddball proposal for a denomination that was not needed.

I agree! This one is a definite head scratcher for me!


Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Moderator
Learn More...
Sap's Avatar
Australia
16806 Posts
 Posted 01/13/2026  8:23 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Sap to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I recall hearing somewhere that, when the price of a Coca-cola bottle went up from 5 cents to 6 cents in 1959, Coca-cola lobbied the government to make 6-cent coins to make it easier for people to buy a Coke from vending machines, but this does not seem to be anything to do with this 1917 proposal.

6 cent coins really only make sense in a context where 3 cent coins and 3 dollar notes are already widely circulating. Standing alone, a 6 cent coin makes even less sense than a 3 cent coin in a decimal system, as they don't fit snugly with any of the other denominations. You'd need to save 50 of them to get 3 dollars, or 100 to get 6.

I'm aware of only one decimal currency system where a 6/100 coin has been issued: Haiti, in the 1840s. And that's because they first tried issuing a six-and-a-quarter-of-a-centime coin and found that to be even more impractical, as they had no half-centime or quarter-centime coins. Even the Russian Empire, founders of a fully decimalized currency and implementers of all kinds of odd denominations, never issued a 6 kopek coin (though did issue 6 rouble coins, in their circulating platinum coinage series).
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12252 Posts
 Posted 01/14/2026  07:39 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I've heard a different Coca-Cola coin request story:

- What If? 1924 Warren G. Harding - 7-1/2 Cent Coin



Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187582 Posts
Pillar of the Community
MintedNotPrinted's Avatar
United States
1182 Posts
 Posted 01/14/2026  12:47 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add MintedNotPrinted to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Very intriguing, the man just wanted a 6 cent coin!
  Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 528Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.4 seconds to rattle this change. Forums