Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Shop CCF Members on eBay! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Commems Collection Modern: 2001 Silver Buffalo From National Collector's Mint

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 275Next Topic  
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12252 Posts
 Posted 02/21/2026  10:14 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
This is a 25-year old story, but one that remains an interesting facet of the modern United States ("US") commemorative coin program that continues to have relevance today.


In June 2001, the US Mint released the 2001 American Buffalo Silver Dollar. The design (closely based on the 1913 James Earle Fraser design for the Indian Head/"Buffalo" five-cent piece) was not copy protected. (Today, the Mint has several rules for the use of its designs in place - they are not all automatically in the public domain as with coin/medal designs issued prior to March 1989.) As a result of the lack of copyright, many private mints/marketing companies reproduced the designs on a variety of numismatic medals, bullion pieces and tokens. (The popular design continues to be used today!)

Within weeks, the National Collector's Mint ("NCM") was advertising its version of the "Silver Buffalo" piece. The NCM is a coin and collectibles marketing company that has grown over the years and expanded its product offerings beyond its original limited offerings - it still operates today.

The problem with NCM in 2001, was that its "Silver Buffalo" was deceptively advertised to give the impression that it was a genuine US Government issue, which, of course, it was not. For example, the headline of the advertisement shown below touts "NEW 2001 U.S. GOV'T SILVER BUFFALO DOLLAR" It is quite clear that the headline, coupled with the Washington, DC dateline, was intended to falsely establish a link between the NCM product and the US Government.

2001 National Collector's Mint "Silver Buffalo" Advertisement
Commems-Collection-Modern:-2001-Silver-Buffalo-From-National-Collector's-Mint
(Image Credit: National Collectors Mint, various oublications. 2001.)

Enough people purchased the NCM "Silver Buffalo" thinking that it was actually an official, lower-priced US Mint product, that the Mint was compelled to issue public warnings about the pieces and how they were not US Mint products - individual customer responses were deemed inadequate.

Note: Due to the design's public domain status, the NCM was not the only private firm to create collectibles with the "Buffalo" design in 2001, but it was the most visible and pervasive of the marketers.

The Mint did not sue the NCM in 2001, preferring instead to pursue its "educate the public" initiative vs. legal action.

The educational effort highlighted the fact that the NCM medals did not carry a denomination as did genuine US coins, that most NCM pieces were silver-plated vs. 90% solid silver (though some were one-ounce of solid 0.999 fine silver) and that the NCM replica lacked the artist's initial "F" (indicating James Earle Fraser as the design's creator). On the "plus" side, the NCM pieces were inscribed "COPY" as per the Hobby Protection Act of 1973 - an inscription not found on genuine coins.

Note: The coin illustrating the advertisement above did not include the "COPY" inscription - another bit of intentional potential deception?.

IMO, the US Mint's immediate sales success with its American Buffalo Silver Dollar afforded it more leeway to pursue options other than legal action against NCM. Its education-focused approach was aided by the fact that the Mint's Silver Dollar proved very popular with collectors and sold out its authorization of 500,000 coins in just 15 days (June 7, 2001 - June 21, 2001). The Mint did not have to compete against the NCM for an extended period (late Summer, Fall and early Winter).

2001 National Collector's Mint "America United Silver Eagle" Advertisement
Commems-Collection-Modern:-2001-Silver-Buffalo-From-National-Collector's-Mint
(Image Credit: National Collectors Mint, various publications. 2001.)

At The same time, however, the NCM was marketing several World Trade Center ("WTC") pieces as "official" products (which they weren't) which caused the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") to engage and sue NCM for deceptive marketing and for misleading customers. Originally sued for $22 million, NCM eventually settled for $750,000 and an agreement by which it would change its marketing to make it clear that its WTC products were private-sponsored collectibles vs. official government products.

That's a quick summary of the NCM vs. US Mint story of circa 2001. There's more to the story, of course, but I believe I've hit the high points. I encourage those who want to learn more details to use their favorite search tools to explore the topic further.


For other of my posts about commemorative coins and medals, including more modern US commemorative coin stories, see: Commems Collection




Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Moderator
Learn More...
nickelsearcher's Avatar
United States
15386 Posts
 Posted 02/21/2026  12:44 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsearcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
To me this is clearly a case of deceptive marketing. You would also need to read the fine print to realize this is a clad base with thin .999 silver plating.
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
94728 Posts
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187582 Posts
 Posted 02/23/2026  12:44 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Very interesting and thank you for sharing.


Quote:
To me this is clearly a case of deceptive marketing. You would also need to read the fine print to realize this is a clad base with thin .999 silver plating.
  Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 275Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.27 seconds to rattle this change. Forums