PCGS 1899 Barber Dime .... - Coin Community Forum

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Author	Replies: 13 / Views: 1,076
Coinguy1986 Valued Member United States 305 Posts	Posted 10/24/2015 5:49 pm Hey guys What would everyone grade this old dime ? Sorry about the photos , best I could get ! Report this Post to the Staff

T-BOP Rest in Peace United States 18456 Posts	Posted 10/24/2015 5:57 pm Very sharp strike, love the original toning. MS-66. Report this Post to the Staff
Coinfrog Bedrock of the Community United States 94367 Posts	Posted 10/24/2015 6:04 pm I'll go 65. Super nice! Report this Post to the Staff
panzaldi Bedrock of the Community United States 18741 Posts	Posted 10/24/2015 9:31 pm EYE APPEAL MS65 doesn't do this coin justice. MS66 unless the surface mark above the N in ONE holds it back. Report this Post to the Staff
CoinCollector2012 Pillar of the Community United States 8137 Posts	Posted 10/24/2015 9:32 pm MS-65 Report this Post to the Staff
Joseph7420 Bedrock of the Community Canada 11922 Posts	Posted 10/24/2015 11:28 pm MS-65. Very nice Report this Post to the Staff
SilverStackerKid Pillar of the Community United States 6478 Posts	Posted 10/25/2015 01:58 am 65 Report this Post to the Staff
trout1105 Pillar of the Community Australia 7096 Posts	Posted 10/25/2015 02:06 am Eye appeal is all there, But too much "Chatter" on the reverse to make MS65. MS64/64+ Exceptionally nice Coin Edited by trout1105 10/25/2015 02:09 am Report this Post to the Staff
jdiablo30 Pillar of the Community United States 946 Posts	Posted 10/25/2015 07:54 am ms63-64 Report this Post to the Staff
jjwabraham Valued Member United States 288 Posts	Posted 10/25/2015 08:14 am If that didn't grade at MS65, my definition of eye-appeal is out the window. What a beauty! Report this Post to the Staff
IndianGoldEagle Bedrock of the Community United States 36906 Posts	Posted 10/25/2015 10:01 am MS-64 Report this Post to the Staff
Imthealphaomega Pillar of the Community United States 3210 Posts	Posted 10/25/2015 10:25 am Ms65 toning gives it extra nice appeal so possible 66 Report this Post to the Staff
Coinguy1986 Valued Member United States 305 Posts	Posted 10/25/2015 11:28 am Thanks for posting everyone !! I really wish I could tell you guys it was a 65 or 66 but unfortunally pcgs gave it a 62 ... In hand the coin is a true beauty but as was mentioned the reverse does have some chatter , now the obverse it pretty clear except for a few stray hairlines ... There are a couple spots on the obverse right field and a few ( not sure what to call it ) but kind of like strips in the toning on Liberty's hat .. Even with the things I mentioned I thought they were a bit tough on this one as I thought atleast 63 .. Still yet one of my favorite barbers ! Report this Post to the Staff
IndianGoldEagle Bedrock of the Community United States 36906 Posts	Posted 10/25/2015 1:24 pm I think they went 62 due to the large field marks on both sides. The tone hides most of the obverse marks. Still, I think 62 was a bit tough on this one. Report this Post to the Staff
	Replies: 13 / Views: 1,076

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

All Forums Category: US Coins and Currency Forums Forum: US Classic and Colonial Coin Grading

Silver Gold Bull US is the United States leading bullion dealer. We deliver gold coins, gold bars, silver coins, silver bars and precious metals to your door. Order today!

The First Dollar, your premier source for bullion and rare coins. See our bullion list on the site and the coin inventory on ebay.

View Last 100 New Topics

View Last 100 Active Topics

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum

It took 0.28 seconds to rattle this change.