| Author |
 Replies: 14 / Views: 960 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
398 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
AU50.
Edited by Coinfrog
10/31/2015 5:21 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5828 Posts |
 AU-50 |
|
Valued Member
 United States
398 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
It's a very nice 50. A couple of carbon spots but still very nice.
Really tough in this grade.
Edited by Coinfrog
10/31/2015 6:16 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
 VERY nice AU53. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
I concur with the others, AU-50
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
How do you guys say that the reverse of this coin is a straight AU
Obverse AU-50, Reverse VF-25 Net EF-40 IMHO.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
1921 S's should be graded in comparison with 1922 No D's. Honestly a nice AU-55 piece here. Often times were struck with worn out dies.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
398 Posts |
Perhaps this coin was not in circulation, but some reason it looks worn when it really is just turning color from red/brown to brown?
Yes, I know there are some "dings" on the coin, but is there "wear"?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4541 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19987 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4085 Posts |
No way do you get VF or XF wear but still have the amount of red mint luster on the reverse - so the conclusion to me is a worn out die leading to a weak, mushy strike - pretty common in many of the D and S mint coins up to about 1927 or so when they start getting much better strike-wise.
AU53 or 55 I'd say.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
398 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36916 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 960 |
|
Posted 10/31/2015 5:37 pm
