| Author |
Replies: 5,932 / Views: 238,404 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1321 Posts |
Ilkhans (sorta Iran) 2 Dinars, AH725 Siwas Mint 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1842 Posts |
Edited by bd251 06/13/2026 10:22 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Australia
2533 Posts |
I seem to recall reading somewhere that the two was represented as a retrograde 9 at Qrim on occasion. It is a two with a filled in loop perhaps?
The Ox moves slowly, but the Earth is patient.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1842 Posts |
I'm definitely not an expert, but I can see that as easily as a "retrograde 9" now that you've pointed it out. I just know that all examples on zeno have "795= 725 AH" for the date.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Australia
2533 Posts |
AH (72)4 1324 CE Dehli Sultans 4 gani  
The Ox moves slowly, but the Earth is patient.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
188770 Posts |
Fantastic examples this weekend! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1321 Posts |
Ilkhans again, This time Baghdad, AH724, 2 Dinars 
|
|
Moderator
  United States
188770 Posts |
Quote: This time Baghdad, AH724, 2 Dinars Excellent! 
|
|
Moderator
  United States
188770 Posts |
Today is 1323 (AH 723) 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Australia
2533 Posts |
AH 723 1323 CE Dehli Sultans 4 Gani  
The Ox moves slowly, but the Earth is patient.
Edited by ttkoo 06/16/2026 12:13 pm
|
|
Moderator
  United States
188770 Posts |
Quote: AH 723 1323 CE Dehli Sultans 4 Gani Nice example! 
|
|
Moderator
  United States
188770 Posts |
Today is 1322 (AH 722) 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1321 Posts |
I thought I had a 722, but it had a titchy photo again - so I found it from whence it was stashed to get a better photo. Only to find it's a 720 not a 722. So I don't have one. :(
|
|
Moderator
  United States
188770 Posts |
Bummer.  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Russian Federation
5174 Posts |
While we're waiting for 1322 (I vaguely recall that ttkoo had one?), here's my doubtful 1323...   If the 2x2 label is correct, this is the same type and date as ttkoo's 1323. Unfortunately there's a glint on the plastic in the exact wrong spot to be sure of the date strokes, and it doesn't look like I've ever photographed this coin outside the 2x2 holder. To the best of my knowledge, my next plausible entry is in the 12th century. I would be surprised if this edition gets that far... though the 8th just might.
|
| |
Replies: 5,932 / Views: 238,404 |