| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,855 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3345 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
326 Posts |
That's a very sweet looking coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4132 Posts |
MS65 maybe MS66. Not quite FB.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
5375 Posts |
I believe the coin might be FB, but not sure on the grade based on the pics.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5838 Posts |
Seeing blotch spots, I think is MS-64 but lacking FB, unless is the photo.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
209 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
I think they gave it a MS-65. Nice coin!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
Full bands for me gets it to about the MS-65 grade. UNLESS those marks on the obverse are on the face.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
132 Posts |
ms64 gorgeous coin though!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2150 Posts |
65 and I bet NGC gave it FB.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
421 Posts |
I would say ms-65, and looks like fb designation to me.
woohoo post 100 for me!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4132 Posts |
1942-D is a well-struck date generally, so they're not going to give as much slack on the FB designation that they might give to a tougher date like 1945.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10284 Posts |
I guess that NGC will say MS65FB
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10635 Posts |
I'll say MS-64, But hoping you get MS-65. Difficult to judge to see if FB from the pic.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1150 Posts |
From those photos I'll say MS65FSB.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3345 Posts |
Here ya go fellas. I woulda said 64 as well, what with all the splotches on it. 
|
| |
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,855 |