I'm almost embarrassed to confess this, but I watched it again. The story-telling was a bit slick, and it merged two stories. They were guilty of one crime (the "Yellow Rose of Texas"), which made them suspects for the later, larger fraud and theft. They deny any involvement in the later case, and half of the movie concerns their efforts to clear their names.
the "Yellow Rose of Texas" case justifies the description "dodgy", but the question remains, "how dodgy ?"
the "Yellow Rose of Texas" case justifies the description "dodgy", but the question remains, "how dodgy ?"






















