Ok here's an update. yesterday I contacted numerous people regarding this coin and so far I have had a mixed range of responses. I was suggested that if it was 1807 it could of been struck using a corroded die. I compared the positioning of the '0' with that of a 1806 and I'm now swaying towards that it was an 1806 instead of an 1807. Another suggestion which would fit in with it being a 1806 is:
Quote:
The only logical explanation I can think of is that a serviceable 1806 die was reused. The 6 could have been filled and re-cut as a 7, though it would be strange that your coin would have been struck with the die in the intermediate stage with the 6 filled and before the 7 was re-cut.
I'm still waiting on a few more responses, I will let you know what the outcome is

.