| Author |
Replies: 120 / Views: 12,662 |
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15522 Posts |
This thread has recently been occupied by folks offering examples of NGC mistakes et all ... I get all that concern ... but piling onto a thread by a CCF member does not serve the OP interest.
I suggest we return it to the OP and address his/her original concerns ..
What to do with this obviously misattributed coin?
Hopeful the OP took our advice and returned it to the seller ... looking for an update.
David
|
|
Valued Member
United States
126 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
743 Posts |
Thats cool and I agree this is the OP's thread but it is more than obvious there is something fishy going on with their entire system. I agree send the coin back to the seller and make them refund you in full or get ebay involved. Any legit seller would take the coin back with no questions. I hope the seller realizes that either he/she is involved or there is something very wrong going on with NGC. I think the seller should be brought into this matter and be asked how he came into possession of these coins. If he states he bought them then where did they originate. Everything is trackable these days. This crap needs to stop.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
853 Posts |
Quote: If they were from the same submission, probably fairly good. Send in say half a dozen large dates and identify them as small dates on the invoice there is a pretty fair chance they will get listed in the computer as small dates.
This could be the answer. The seller also has a "1970 S Shotgun Roll Lincoln Cents Unopened Possible Small Dates" listed right now. The seller could have sent in some during one of those super deal (10 for $125) promos. Here is the link to the roll: http://www.ebay.com/itm/1970-S-Shot...em2ecbf76323
|
|
Pillar of the Community
743 Posts |
Either way NGC is at fault because they should be looking at the coins before holdering them.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
Quote: they should be looking at the coins before holdering them. Exactly--and it should take an expert less than 10 seconds to confirm a 70-S SD--there's no excuse.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
743 Posts |
It is more than obvious the seller knows they are actually LD and he thinks he is getting away with it. I am still not happy that NGC would do this and it makes you wonder if they are not just keeping a "really good customer" happy? The first page of his coin listings are 80% NGC graded coins.
Edited by 7TF 11/27/2013 10:12 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: It is more than obvious the seller knows they are actually LD and he thinks he is getting away with it. I'm not seeing that. Frankly, I think your personal animosity (not that it's unjustified) is getting the best of you.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
743 Posts |
Check out this http://boards.collectors-society.co...4537&fpart=1I know it is off topic but imagine how much these guys are ripping off total newbies to the coin collecting world that don't know what they are buying. The say they are pros but this kind of mistake would never happen to a pro unless it was on purpose. I remember when I first started collecting coins in the 1980s as a kid. I used Red Book to find values of the common change I was finding. Then I went to the bank one day and asked for a roll of half dollars. Somehow I was lucky enough to get a 1938-D walking half and a few other silver halves before the bank cut me off. I only knew the values that Red Book gave me because that is what the coin dealer had for sale. I had no idea about varieties and would have never known about them if it were not for the internet and some people showing me the way. I still don't know about Half Varieties and many others although I do know they exist. Lots of this info is hidden in books that are not available online yet. Back to the situation at hand. NGC is at fault for putting these coins into mislabled holders and letting them out of the building. There is no reason not to look at the coins before putting them into the package to send back to the customer.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
743 Posts |
I admit I am going off and it won't make a bit of difference but to say that the seller does not know what is going on is wrong. He has been told about the mislabled coin and he told his buyer that he needs to return it and he will have to pay a restocking fee. Honestly he should not have to pay anything and he should not have to pay shipping costs because it was misrepresented. The seller has more of these coins for sale and look at his complete listings for 1970-s . http://www.ebay.com/sch/timeman21/m...Sold=1&rt=nc
Edited by 7TF 11/27/2013 11:14 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
There's a big difference between what we think and what we can prove. The former is opinion and should be expressed as such; when we blur the line between the two is when I have to come in here with a chainsaw to avoid posters sticking their feet into CCF's mouth. I'm just trying to avoid that eventuality.
NGC has been caught in some egregious errors in the past, and time does not appear to have mitigated their error rate. They're capable and consistent when they get it right, but there seems to be a disconnect between the grading floor and the post-grading processing. It's part of why I wonder about the root cause of this latest series of errors.
And yeah, as has been said here before - why bother attributing if you're not going to stand behind your attribution? That's as much as admitting you're incompetent.
|
|
New Member
United States
41 Posts |
Posted Today 20 Min ago Show Profile Email Poster Check SsuperDdave's ebay Listings Bookmark this reply Add SsuperDdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply Quote: It is more than obvious the seller knows they are actually LD and he thinks he is getting away with it. I'm not seeing that. Frankly, I think your personal animosity (not that it's unjustified) is getting the best of you. I would have to disagree a little Super Dave. The seller has sold more then 11500 items, mostly coins. I would guess they certainly know a small date 1970 from a large date. Too many examples to rely on, on many sites, that show the differences. You can even see in the roll they are selling the coin on top is a large date. What is scary is a coin that easy to detect is getting by all those very knowledgeable people listed on the NGC site.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19972 Posts |
Hummmm....that seller has multiple mis-slabbed 1970-S and yet he sold this? Quote: 1970 S LOT OF 32 Rolls of BU UNC Coins Lincoln Cents NOT CHECKED FOR SMALL DATES OK, who is going to believe these have not been searched? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
743 Posts |
I understand Dave and I am very sorry if I have seemed hostile. You are the moderator and I am certainly not trying to get CCF in any trouble. I am just upset that so many people just let this stuff happen day after day and don't call them out on it. Everything I said is in my opinion and has nothing to do with this website or any of the other posters. I am very sorry and I will back out of this for now unless I see something else that really needs to be pointed out. Please go to Twitter and be heard by as many people as will listen to you about NGC https://twitter.com/NGCcoin. I don' know how much of a difference it will make but if no one speaks we can not be heard. OP, call this seller out and show him documentation on the web of what a real SM date looks like, then if he does not pull the auction that he has listed we will know with out a doubt that he knows it is a LD. Kris
Edited by 7TF 11/27/2013 11:34 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
No need to apologize, 7TF - I don't feel like you've crossed any lines. I'd have pounced immediately if I felt otherwise, because this forum means more to me than any single topic or poster. No harm, no foul.
The next step in this process, I believe, is to take the topic to the Collectors Society board. NGC is not nearly so quick as PCGS to whack postings, and if it's worded respectfully I think it'll get a fair hearing.
|
| |
Replies: 120 / Views: 12,662 |